00void said:
that's because it's a Mac... only Mac ist krieg!!!
he's lucky he was driving a Camry and not a 4Runner. the one thing that sucks about a 4Runner and what my GF holds over my head compared to her Jeep GC = http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?toyota
I agree with the chart. I just experienced a rear-ender a few weeks ago and it was a shocker. Shocker because the accident was pretty impressive, shock wise... sorry, couldn't help myself. lol. Also, a shocker because of the small damage to my 4runner after the accident. I was hit pretty hard, and expecting the worst, I steped out of the car and nothing. The damage was minimal, but the damage to the other car (a full size Dodge van) was extensive. His front bumper was all mangled, and found some tranny fluid on my rear bumper, so I suspect some radiator/tranny cooler damage. He took off (yeah, he did!) and I noticed his damage while I was trying to stop him. I'm sure he felt the impact pretty hard, since his van has full frame, also.
Having the tow hitch contributes to the transfer of the impact as well. Since the tow hitch is bolted on to the frame, it transfers most of the shock to the frame and ultimately; the passengers. I'm glad the damage to my 4runner was minimal, but If the impact was harder, I'm thinking that I want a more "shock friendly" vehicle.
Regardless of the damage and cost to repair the vehicle, I think a unit body platform like the camry, highlander, etc. are safer due to crumple zones, which are an integral part of the design. Full-frame vehicles such as our 4runners are worse for passangers due to the the strong "back bone", ironically. If the vehicle does not absorb the impact too well, guess who/what does? Moi... It hurt like hell and I still feel the accident on my neck and shoulder.
Be safe guys. (I shouldn't be talking... my wife was yelling at me today for racing a motorcycle with my CLS500 on 110 fwy. We were doing 130mph on the carpool lane.) Anyways, be safe.
