Toyota may bring back small FJ Cruiser to Challenge Wrangler

we have to crunch all the CAFE numbers to see if there’s room for them

I still don't get this. Why is Toyota so worried when there are thousands of Mustangs, Chargers, Raptors, Suburbans, Yukons and other gas guzzlers selling like hot cakes.
 
Was watching TundraDude34 last night and he said he had a reliable source saying that a Tundra Diesel isn't in the works...yet. It would be nice to have that as an option for Toyota trucks.
 
Yeah I won't be interested unless it has a solid front axle, the 4.5L V8 turbo-diesel from the LC70, a removable top, and a manual trans...anything else would be a design failure on Toyota's part. :spy:
 
Was watching TundraDude34 last night and he said he had a reliable source saying that a Tundra Diesel isn't in the works...yet. It would be nice to have that as an option for Toyota trucks.

Toyota's hands are all about tied on the diesel situation. Every single half ton will have a diesel option by the end of this year except for Toyota. So they will either have to come out with one or go with some sort of hybrid to equal the efficiency the competition will have with their diesels.
 
Per another Toyota interview. Something Truck/SUV will either be shown or announced in a few weeks at the Chicago Auto Show.
 
Toyota's hands are all about tied on the diesel situation. Every single half ton will have a diesel option by the end of this year except for Toyota. So they will either have to come out with one or go with some sort of hybrid to equal the efficiency the competition will have with their diesels.

The electric motor should help with that. Whether it is a good idea or not is a whole 'nother story...
 
Wrangler JL is damn impressive off-road:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CVdR4EyRIvE" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Whatever Toyota brings out to challenge it better be ready...hopefully not some sissified re-branding of current platform.
 
Last edited:
Wrangler

My wife has had 2 a sport and a rubicon, fj will never take a market share from them. Wrangler checks all the boxes.
 
Pretty much

The sport went 100k and traded it in for the rubicon. We had both for a long time. She eventually wanted more of a luxury suv and got an RR sport. The only problem is they crack a lot of windshields, I guess cause they are flat. At one point I had a Hummer H3 Alpha and she had the wrangler. Both trucks had a bunch of windshields replaced due to them being flat. We had no mechanical issues at all just windshields.
 
Last edited:
Wrangler JL is damn impressive off-road:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CVdR4EyRIvE" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Whatever Toyota brings out to challenge it better be ready...hopefully not some sissified re-branding of current platform.



A 4Runner can do every bit of what that Wrangler did.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Wrangler JL is damn impressive off-road:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CVdR4EyRIvE" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Whatever Toyota brings out to challenge it better be ready...hopefully not some sissified re-branding of current platform.

My problem with Toyota is that they aren't competitive in engine and drivetrain options anymore, the 5th gen 4Runner had a cheap interior until they finally tweaked for the 5.5 gen refresh, and pricing is not in line for what you get--most of the "content" you get are appearance packages instead of focusing on improving the vehicle.

As for the "it's a basic 4x4" angle. It's not. They clearly market and price it with vehicles that have substantially better interiors, seating, drivetrains, and infotainment and if they want to go for the bare bones market, they need to sell a much cheaper version or just bring over the 70 series.

Jeep lets you build a bare bones wrangler or dress it up with shit you don't need. Toyota won't let you do that, and it's even a stretch to compare a SFA vehicle to IFS.

Toyota is marketing to too many segments with the 4Runner. I'm not really looking forward to the next generation or the FJ thing if the shit show that is the 3rd gen Taco is the best they can do.
 
A 4Runner can do every bit of what that Wrangler did.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

From factory, Rubicon has:

- 4:1 LO range (crawl ratio of 77:1 with automatic and 84:1 with manual)

- “Dana 44” axles that are much stronger and feature a different ring and pinion (210 mm/8.27 inches front and 220 mm/8.66 inches rear on Rubicon)...based on Dana’s new Advantek design

- Front and rear lockers

- Front axle disconnect that is improved upon

- Standard rock sliders

- 33-inch-tall LT285/70R17 BFGoodrich All-Terrain KO tires

- Ample clearances & angles (impressive 10.9-inch running ground clearance, an approach angle of 44 degrees, breakover angle of 27.8 degrees, and a departure angle of 37 degrees)

- 30 inches of water fording (with standard breather tubes on both axles)

- Available Diesel engine next year with 260 hp and 442 lb-ft of torque...add that to 4:1 LO range...yikes!

So, yeah, i doubt that any stock (or even most modified) Toyota vehicles can follow a Rubicon on the trail. You have to really trick out your 4runner with $$$ aftermarket parts to match what the Rubicon has off-road in terms of capability.

But, yeah, the argument against Jeep is reliability and on-road performance. But at least, Jeep claims that on-road performance is improving. So, will see.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,130
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top