Since you said "no way" I guess you must be right. I'm sure all the people that said the exact same thing about the Durango, Explorer, Blazer, Grand Cherokee and Pathfinder will be happy to have a new member in their club. It does not matter what the global market does with the 120 or 150 platform, US regulation is forcing huge change with deadlines in place.
I never said the 150 platform was going away, however I did say the 4Runner as we know it was going away. The North American market seldom (if ever) reflects the same trends as most other markets. Fact is, I wish I could think you are correct, and I hope you are. But BOF is not long for this world as it pertains to the mid sized SUV market. Again, I DID NOT say the 4Runner was going away, just like the Jeep GC, Nissan Pathfinder, Ford Explorer and so on, I'm sure the 4Runner will live on, but not as a BOF vehicle.
I'm willing to bet 3000 circuit city reward points on it.
Exactly. Once someone on the internet says "no way" it's set in stone. :biggrin1:
Chrysler: Should anyone point to any recent Chrysler decision and use it as an example of a good decision? Anyway, the Grand Cherokee was reintroduced as a CUV in the 1990's because that was the "new technology" at the time. The full-sized Durango was discontinued during the recession because 1) gas-hog vehicle sales were down and 2) no one trusted Chrysler anymore. It came back in as 3rd gen using the same frame as the Grand Cherokee to save money. For what it's worth, these vehicles left the Wrangler intact as BOF, and the introduction of the Wrangler Unlimited brought back a BOF SUV to the Chrysler fold. Jeep sales are still going strong and climbing.
Nissan Pathfinder: It went from BOF to CUV back to BOF. But the last conversion left the XTerra alone as Nissan's off-road SUV. I compare the Pathfinder to the Highlander and the XTerra to the 4Runner. The XTerra was cancelled because of poor sales, not because of fuel economy.
Chevy Blazer: The full-sized K5 Blazer was simply renamed the Tahoe, Yukon, and Suburban (extended length). All are still in production and still BOF. Chevy basically abandoned the mid-size off-road SUV market in the early 2000's with the demise of the S-10 Blazer. They decided to concentrate on the full-size and compact markets.
The Ford Explorer is your most valid argument. They switched to CUV in 2010 and sales took off. The primary difference between Ford and Toyota is that Ford only has one mid-sized SUV marketed to all buyers; off-road and mall crawlers. They switched to more closely target the bigger market.
Toyota has two mid-sized SUVs marketed to different demographics, both with very good sales figures. With the very successful 4Runner sharing a platform with the very successful Prado, there is no manufacturing savings to switching to the Highlander frame so the Cherokee/Durango argument is out. Toyota already has the Highlander, so the Pathfinder argument is out, and the 4Runner sales are strong so no reason to cancel like the FJ or XTerra. The 4Runner will continue as BOF to compete with the Wrangler, with the Wrangler being the dedicated off-road version and the 4Runner as the more refined option. With the demise of the FJ, XTerra, and GX, sales of the 4Runner will increase significantly.
Finally, for what it's worth, going CUV won't be the end of off-roading the 4Runner. You'll still be able to install lifts and tires and lights. The problem will be armor. Unless they provide reinforced connection points, installing upgraded skid plates, rocker sliders, and winch bumpers will be much more difficult.
Now going forward....
when are you saying the 4Runner will go CUV? 6th gen or 7th gen? I predict at least one more gen as BOF, so I say 7th Gen.