GreyhoundGuy
New member
EDIT/UPDATE: I bought Firestone Destination A/Ts this morning ... 265/70/17 and had them mounted on the 17x7.5" FJ rims that I picked up on Friday night. The ride is fantastic. I think it's the best call I could have made!
Thanks for all the advice and suggestions!
-Joel
---
I've got a friend that just bought a '13 Tacoma in July. She doesn't like the tires (BFG Rugged Terrains, 265/65/17) and wants to buy quieter highway tires. I told her I may be interested in buying them, and I'm sure she'd cut me a great deal. (Her tires are basically new. She's hardly driven the Taco.)
The 65 is the part I'm worried about. I checked some sites (including this one), and it shows that my speedo could be off by a couple mph... 55 mph shown would be 53.24 mph, 70 mph shown would be 67.76 mph. I'm not overly concerned about the speedo issue... more about the difference in shown mileage and actual mileage.
This site shows that the 245/60/20s that my LE is running now has a circumference of 99.2 inches. The 265/70/17s has a circumference of 99.29... REALLY close to the factory setup. The 265/65/17s have a circumference of 96.02 inches... a difference of 3.28 inches. Three inches seems minor... but the 265 takes 21 extra revolutions per mile... for about 63 inches per mile. Over the course of 50,000 miles, that's 3,150,000 inches, or 262,500 feet, or 49.71 miles. (I think I'm doing that math right.)
My thoughts are that the 265/65 is A) going to show me the wrong speed, B) give me the wrong mileage, and C) give me the wrong info for mpg... so it's a no brainer to buy the 265/70s.
What say y'all? Go with the 265/70s and stay really close to the original circumference, or go with the 265/65s and deal with the issues... but potentially save a good chunk of money?
-Joel
Thanks for all the advice and suggestions!
-Joel
---
I've got a friend that just bought a '13 Tacoma in July. She doesn't like the tires (BFG Rugged Terrains, 265/65/17) and wants to buy quieter highway tires. I told her I may be interested in buying them, and I'm sure she'd cut me a great deal. (Her tires are basically new. She's hardly driven the Taco.)
The 65 is the part I'm worried about. I checked some sites (including this one), and it shows that my speedo could be off by a couple mph... 55 mph shown would be 53.24 mph, 70 mph shown would be 67.76 mph. I'm not overly concerned about the speedo issue... more about the difference in shown mileage and actual mileage.
This site shows that the 245/60/20s that my LE is running now has a circumference of 99.2 inches. The 265/70/17s has a circumference of 99.29... REALLY close to the factory setup. The 265/65/17s have a circumference of 96.02 inches... a difference of 3.28 inches. Three inches seems minor... but the 265 takes 21 extra revolutions per mile... for about 63 inches per mile. Over the course of 50,000 miles, that's 3,150,000 inches, or 262,500 feet, or 49.71 miles. (I think I'm doing that math right.)
My thoughts are that the 265/65 is A) going to show me the wrong speed, B) give me the wrong mileage, and C) give me the wrong info for mpg... so it's a no brainer to buy the 265/70s.
What say y'all? Go with the 265/70s and stay really close to the original circumference, or go with the 265/65s and deal with the issues... but potentially save a good chunk of money?
-Joel
Last edited: