Warranty 101: Warranty and You - TD1, recalls, updates, Magnuson Moss, etc...

AudiTech

New member
I typed this up about 6 months ago for a different forum I'm on. I apologize because as you'll see it's specifically about VW/Audi and how they do things. It's still a lot of good info that is relevant to other brands because there's not going to be drastic differences in the basic way car manufactures operate. i also felt 5th Gen forum was appropriate as they are the vehicles with warranties.

------------------------------------------------------






Warranty is one of those odd things that everyone knows what it is but not many seems to really understand it. I’m going to attempt to bring some clarity to factory warranty and the things that go with it. For those of you that don't know me I'll start with a little about my background. I spent over a decade as Volkswagen technician before moving to Audi in 2014. I'm certified by Volkswagen as an Engine Performance Specialist, Transmission Specialist, Chassis Specialist, Electrical Specialist, Routan Specialist, e-Mobility (hybrid) Specialist, Expert Technician, Diagnostic Technician, and Volkswagen Master Technician. I'm certified by Audi as Engine Performance Specialist, Transmission Specialist, Chassis Specialist, Expert Technician, and Audi Master Technician. I've been an installer for APR at a dealership, I've been a Team Leader and Shop Foreman, I've have guys work under me, I've trained apprentices, and I've been given VW's Generation Best award multiple times, I've been in VW's Service Qualification Championship multiple time. Basically when it comes to cars, and more specifically VW/Audi, I know a thing or two about a thing or two.

Chapter 1 - Lets start with the basics… What is a warranty?
Dictionary.com defines a warranty as “a written guarantee given to the purchaser of a new appliance, automobile, or other item by the manufacturer or dealer, usually specifying that the manufacturer will make any repairs or replace defective parts free of charge for a stated period of time.”

Audi defines warranty as “a guarantee that the manufacturer will replace any component that fails as a result of manufacturer’s defect in material or workmanship”

The key word is underlined in both definitions is Defect/Defective. A warranty is not a get out of jail free card if you mess up your car, it’s to cover the repair expenses involved in parts that have failed prematurely through normal use.

I happen to have a Warranty and Maintenance Guide in my hands right now, while it is a Toyota one the disclaimers are pretty standard across every brand. It says:
-Maintenance - You are responsible for performance of the required maintenance indicated in the Owner’s Manual and this booklet. Toyota will not deny a warranty claim solely because you do not have records to show that you maintained your vehicle. However, any failure or noncompliance caused by the lack of maintenance in not covered by this warranty. When maintenance and repairs are paid for by you, these services may be performed by you or by any automotive service provider you choose. Toyota will not deny a warranty claim solely because you used a service provider other than a Toyota dealership for maintenance and repairs. However, any failure or noncompliance caused by improper maintenance or repairs is not covered by this warranty.*****That last part is important and we will come back to that later.*****

-What is Not Covered: This warranty does not cover damage or failures resulting directly or indirectly from any of the following: Fire, accidents, theft, abuse, negligence, misuse - for example, racing or overloading, improper repairs, alteration or tampering including installation of non-genuine Toyota Accessories, lack of or improper maintenance including the use of fluids other than those specified in the Owner’s Manual, installation of non-Genuine Toyota Parts, airborne chemicals, tree sap, road debris (including stone chips), rail dust, salt, hail, floods, windstorms, lightning, and other environmental conditions, and water contamination.

With a new car you get a few different warranties:
-New Vehicle Limited Warranty: covers manufacturer’s defects in material or workmanship. **Adjustments and items that was subject to wear are typically only covered for 12 months or 12,000 miles and NOT the length of the NVLM**

-Limited Warranty Against Corrosion Perforation: covers any repair or replacement to correct a defect in manufacturer’s material and workmanship that will result in rust perforation of the vehicle body.

-Federal Emissions Warranty: Emissions Control System Defect Warranty covers emissions related parts that fail to conform to US EPA regulations due to defect in material or workmanship. Federal law mandates the coverage period is 2 years or 24,000 miles for all emission related parts and 8 years or 80,000 miles for specific control devices. Emissions Control System Performance Warranty covers emission related parts that fail to pass an approved state inspection and maintenance test. Federal law mandates the coverage period is 2 years or 24,000 miles for all emission related parts and 8 years or 80,000 miles for specific control devices.

-California Emissions Warranty: I’m not getting into it, screw California and everything about it.

Chapter 2 - Campaigns... Recalls, Service Actions, and Updates
Recalls: Recalls are conducted for safety, compliance, and emissions-related defects. These actions are reported to and monitored by government agencies such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or the Environmental Protection Agency. Recall eligibility never expires. The manufacturer with cover the cost of of parts and labor to perform the recall until it has been completed. Even a totaled or salvaged title vehicle is entitled to have recalls performed. The law requires that the manufacturer sends a letter via 1st class mail to the last known owner of every vehicle that falls within the recall parameters outlining what the recall is for and how it will be addressed.

Service Actions: Service Actions are conducted to address customer satisfaction and product technical issues that are not directly related to safety or compliance but can sometimes be emissions-related in scope. Service Actions can be completed on vehicles showing a totaled or salvaged title. The manufacturer is not required to but sends letters via 1st class mail to the last known owner of every vehicle that falls within the Service Action parameters. Service Actions may be limited to a specific time which will be clearly noted in the letter.

Updates: Updates are meant to address and prevent quality issues and are provided as part of the brands commitment to quality and reliability of their products. Updates are proactive vehicle enhancements. Updates are an investment in customer satisfaction, loyalty, and vehicle reliability. The manufacturer does NOT mail letters to the customers informing them of vehicle updates, when the vehicle is brought to the dealership for service the VIN shows an open update and is performed free of charge to vehicles that fall within the specified warranty period such as the New Vehicle Limited Warranty (NVLW), Federal Emissions Warranty (FED_EMS), or Extended Warranty (WARR_EXT). Vehicles with a totaled or salvaged title are NOT covered by updates. If a vehicles coverage for an update has expired an Update should be offered at the customer expense.

Now that you know what a recall is, can you see why despite the amount of complaining on the internet about the leaking 2.0T TSI water pumps, it's never going to become a “recall”?

Chapter 3 - TSBs.... Technical Service Bulletins
Technical Service Bulletins are NOT the same as Recalls, Service Actions, or Updates. A dealership does not perform a TSB on your vehicle just because you read about it online and asked them to do it. The manufacturer makes a ton of vehicles and they monitor the repairs made on them. When they see a pattern relating to a specific concern they will release a TSB that addresses it. That doesn't mean you can read about it and come in demanding it be performed on your vehicle, it means if your vehicle is has the concern XYZ and THE DEALERSHIP CAN DUPLICATE IT that they have seen a pattern and you should inspect/replace/lube/modify whatever is listed in the bulletin before digging into it further. It’s just saying this is a common/semi-common thing so lets start with looking at this. For example the TSI timing chain tensioner TSB people love to talk about. All the TSB says is if it’s running rough and it has cam/crank allocation fault to check the tensioner… that’s it. That doesn't mean you can come in and get a new tensioner because there's a TSB.

Chapter 4 - Bringing your vehicle to a dealership for service.
Technically when you bring a vehicle in for ANY concern (customers don’t have “complaints” they have “concerns”), no matter how new or how low the mileage is, the service adviser is supposed to have the customer authorize $X for diagnosis before a technician gets the vehicle. If the cause for the concern is covered under warranty, than the manufacturer covers the expense, they reimburse the dealership and the customer never pays a dime. BUT, if it's not something that warranty will pay for (parking sensors inop because you hit something and damaged a sensor, check engine light because a rodents chewed wiring, mass air flow sensor is burnt out from an over oiled aftermarket filter, suspension vibration from mud or ice caked to the inner barrel of the wheels, etc, etc.) then the customer is responsible for the technician’s time into the vehicle via the diagnosis they authorized from the beginning. Just because you are asked to authorize a diagnostic fee up front does not necessarily mean you will charged that fee. 9 times out of 10 you will not be charged that fee as it will be a legitimate warranty repair and not something caused by outside influence.

In the real world it's very common for service writers not to get time authorized on a "warranty" vehicle because they are assuming the problem is a going to be a warranty repair based on nothing other than the vehicle still being within the warranty period. When a vehicle has been modified or has non OEM accessories installed the probability of you being told you need to authorize time up front goes up exponentially. If your vehicle looks like a modified fanboi piece of crap don’t be surprised if you’re asked to authorize a diagnosis fee before anyone looks at the car.

Chapter 5 - TD1… "Engine ECM Modification (Tuning)"
*****These are screenshots of the Audi side of things, it is absolutely 100% identical to the Volkswagen side, ELSA is the same program for both brands*****
When an Audi/VW comes in for service one of the first things the that happens is the ELSA PRO is opened
ELSA1_zps4ff0d382.jpg~original


When you enter the VIN it will show if there are any open campaigns (Recalls, Service Actions, and Updates as listed in the last section) but it will also reveal customer info, warranty info, repair history (anything done at a dealership paid by the manufacturer will show up), etc. In the case of this chipped S4 there is an exclamation point next to vehicle data.
ELSA2_zpsa6bcdb22.jpg~original


When you click on vehicle data it shows… drum roll please… vehicle data! In this case it tells you, clear as day, that the vehicle has been chipped. As you can see to the right of the picture it even reveals the date and mileage of when it was detected that the ECM has been chipped. This is the same place it will show if it has a salvaged or totaled title.
ELSA3_zps0999d4ff.jpg~original


Now lets talk about how a VIN number get flagged with a TD1 code. I’ve read all sorts of stupid shit that people have imagined up on how this works, everything from the dealership flagging the VIN for any modifications, even just a filter on a stick intake, all the way to tuners reporting your VIN numbers back to VW/Audi. Please stop spreading that. How it happens is very simple and there is nothing a dealership does to intentionally throw you under the bus. The dealership does NOT have the ability to manually “flag” a vehicle that has been modified, the entire process of flagging a VIN with TD1 code is completely behind the scenes and unintentional and unannounced at the dealership level. The way warranty has worked since 2004 with Audi/VW is that you are REQUIRED by the manufacturer to submit a GFF (Guided Fault Finding) log online with any and all warranty repairs for engine, transmission, or electrical related warranty claims. If it’s a suspension problem there’s no reason to submit a GFF log but if it’s anything that throws a fault in ANY system a GFF log is required or the manufacturer will deny the warranty claim and the dealership eats the cost. If the dealer eats the cost the tech does not get paid for the work they did… the tech does not want to work for free, therefore GFF log are ALWAYS sent in to ensure payment on warranty repairs. Anytime you run a GFF log or you perform an SVM (software) update the scan tool records all sorts of hidden data and send it back to the manufacturer. That’s how a VIN gets flagged with TD1, it’s not the dealership telling on you and manually flagging it, it’s the factory scan tool detecting it is not factory software and reporting it back to the manufacturer.

Putting it in stock mode and locking the ECM…
Some people have gotten the impression that they can switch their tune “stock” mode and “lock” it and somehow that makes it undetectable… or even more absurd , that if it’s “locked” that the tune can't be overwritten/flashed back to stock by the dealer. I don’t know how people came up with that or why people think that but I’d wish they would stop saying it. It doesn't matter what mode it’s in or it’s locked it has absolutely ZERO effect on the scan tools ability to detect the tune or the dealerships ability to overwrite your aftermarket software. If your ECM has been tuned and it's locked, all that means is someone can’t change the program mode (Valet, Stock, 91 octane, 93 octane, 100 octane) without the password… and literally nothing else.

The evolution of TD1… remember when shit hit the fan when I posted this thread **link removed, not relevant on this forum**
It started off as saying TD1 - Motor SG geaendert. It then became TD1 - Engine ECM Modification (Tuning). It eventually evolved to Volkswagen (Audi has not done this **yet**) emailing every single dealership technician the link to a video that every single VW tech will have to watch in order to get/maintain their certification for the year that shows how to see if vehicle has been chipped. There is officially no more hiding it and no more ignorant employees who don't how to figure it out. You know, I know, the dealership knows, and the manufacturer knows.
IMG_7714_zps6eb15c57.png~original


Chapter 6 - We all know I’m chipped, who cares, they can’t void my warranty without proving my modifications broke the car.
Shut up. I hate to admit it but I used to be naive enough to think that was the case as well. If it makes you feel better most people (even “mod friendly” dealer techs) have no idea how the always misconstrued Magnuson-Moss Act applies in the real world.

People like to talk about the it like it's some golden ticket to modify cars. People love claiming the dealership has to "PROVE" your modifications caused the problem/failure because that's what they heard from their aunts neighbors dog walkers cousin step son who comes over to bang their mom on Tuesdays, read on the internet. That is simply not true. I’ve had the opportunity to spend some time talking with the guy who inspects vehicles and goes to court on behalf of Volkswagen in the case of buybacks, lemon law cars, “thermal events” (when shit catches fire) and things of that nature. I got to grill him on some fact vs fiction warranty stuff, no more theory, or this place does it this way, or I heard this.... this was straight from the horse mouth from the man who goes to court for the manufacture as their technical product expert. The Magnuson-Moss Act goes all the way back to the 4th paragraph of chapter 1 where I said that last part was important and we'd come back to it… we’re coming back to it. The purpose of the Magnuson-Moss Act is so the manufacturers can not void your warranty for using aftermarket parts and service without proving it was the cause of failure. The confusion seems to come from the term "aftermarket". This does not apply to modifications made to the vehicle, it applies to direct replacement and maintenance parts. If the manufacturer tries to tell you your warranty is void because you got your oil changed at Jiffy Lube instead of at a dealership, the Magnuson-Moss Act would protect you against that and they would have to prove that the aftermarket oil change caused the whatever failed to fail. It's basically a law that stops a monopoly against interdependent repair shops and parts stores. If you modify their product to perform outside of it's original operating range they have ZERO obligation to "prove" that your modifications caused of the failure. If it makes it goes all the way to court it’s as simple as "it wasn't designed for that ” and it’s an open and shut case, the manufacturer will not be held accountable for the durability of something operating outside of the range of what it was designed for. It still holds true they can't deny warranty coverage on something unrelated, if you have a chipped ECM and your radio craps out they still need to cover your radio under warranty, seeing as it’s a completely unrelated system they would, in that situation, have to prove your ECM flash killed the radio. But, when you modify the engine to add power the burden of proof is no longer on them for ANY powertrain failure because it wasn't designed to handle the higher loads and stresses than the factory stock XXXhp provides. Legally by making it operate outside of factory stock specified range and/or power levels is “proof’ enough that the manufacturer does not have to honor your warranty.

That being said, modifications are not a clear cut, black and white voided warranty. The only way to flat out “void the warranty” is if it has a salvage or totaled title.

Chapter 7 Warranty work on a modified car.

The way warranty works is the customer brings the vehicle to the dealership for a concern. The tech diagnoses the car, repairs the car, documents everything, and returns the defective part back to the manufacturer. When the warranty claim is processed, they look over the documentation for the basics, if everything checks out then the manufacturer reimburses the dealership for the cost of the repair. If they find something they don't like... the defective part wasn't returned, the returned part wasn't bad, time card punch times don't match up with the repairs, there was an attempted repair on an issue that has a TSB before following the TSB, there's no Guided Fault Finding log uploaded, etc, then the dealership does not got paid for any of the repair, they are forced to eat the full cost of the parts and labor. If that happens the dealership will deduct the time they paid the tech for the repair from the current pay period.

The dealership can "warranty" literally anything they want, but if the manufacturer feels it's not a legit claim then they will not cover the cost of the repair. That is why some dealers are "mod friendly" and others are not, it typically comes down to management deciding how willing they are to risk absorbing the entire cost of the a repair and losing money if the manufacturer doesn't agree with the dealership. It's a risk vs reward thing, they are more likely to try to push something through for a good customer or on some more minor repairs because they want to keep customers happy. If a customer is one of those "Don't wash my car you're going to mess it up", I want this done this way, I know it all because I read about this on the internet, this that and the other thing rattle on tuesdays when its full moon and I'm cresting a hill making a slight left, and then leave a bad survey response type of customers you're a pain in the ass and the dealership is less likely to risk losing money to try to keep you happy. That customer is not worth the risk. Then there is the technician... as a tech do you want to perform a warranty repair if you're not sure if it'll go through knowing full well that if it doesn't then you did the entire job for free? That's where the mod friendliness of the management comes in, they get to make the call, if they choose wrong the tech still gets paid because they aren't at fault.

In the past, before monitoring for chipped cars, it was really just the dealerships word of mouth. No manufacturer wants to incur costs that they don't need to, monitoring for modified vehicles is a good way to potentially cut down on the amount of money they are paying out on repairs that they shouldn't be covering. They just recently sent the email (screenshot from above) out to every single Volkswagen technician in the country saying this is how you know it's flashed. It's too early to see what the end result of that will be, IMHO I think it will turn into the manufacture denying more repairs on modified vehicles. Once dealers start eating repair costs a few times that will be nipped in the butt pretty damn quick.

Lets look at the 2.0T and the potential effects of flashing it. To start with there's a good chance someone removed the ECM, pried the case open, split it in half, and intentionally shorted out a specific spot on the circuit board to ground and then (maybe) put some sealant between the 2 halves of the case and put it back together. The purpose of doing that is to get more power.

Think about on the most basic level, how does an internal combustion engine make power? It burns fuel. It's that simple, if you want more power you need to burn more fuel. Now you've increase the strain on the fuel system to supply more fuel and if you want to burn that extra fuel you supplied you need to bring in more air to keep the air to fuel ratio inline. Which now means more air flow into the engine, which in turn leads to higher cylinder pressures, and than more flow out.

Internal combustion engines are inherently inefficient, a pretty small percent of the energy released from fuel is turned into usable kinetic energy (torque), and a huge portion of the energy is converted to and wasted as heat and noise. If you're burning more fuel you're making more torque and more heat. Engine internals, motor mounts, the entire driveline were designed to reliably handle the stock levels of power long term and you're making them withstand a much higher load. The cooling system and the heat shedding ability on items such as the cylinder head, valves, turbo, etc were designed to reliably handle stock heat loads long term and now you're increasing the heat load. The plastic intake parts: boost piping, intercooler end tanks, intake manifold, and variable intake runner flaps are being forced to operate at roughly twice the amount of pounds of pressure per square inch than what they were designed to reliably handle long term. It goes on and on and on but you get the point. It's all intertwined, a chip makes just about everything powertrain related operate under loads it was designed to handled to handle reliability long term. Let's be honest, that is no longer considered a "defective" part when it fails.... which is what your warranty covers. This does not mean you will be unable to get anything fixed under warranty just because you're car is modified. The dealership and the manufacturer want to keep customers happy and coming back. If it's a common failure part, like coil packs that after 15 years they still haven't gotten right, there's a good chance it's truly a defective part and in theory you wont have much issue getting it covered, but that goes back to the dealers attitude about modifications as I covered above.
 
Register to hide this ad
Chapter 8 - Extended warranty work on a modified car.

The way it's supposed to work is you bring the car in with a concern, you approve a diagnosis charge, they will prepare an estimate for the repairs and submit the claim to your extended warranty. If the bad part is not covered you will be charged that diagnostic fee you approved, if it is a covered item the warranty company will pay it and you don't have to. If it's a relatively cheap repair chances are they will approve it over the phone. If it's more costly, or if your claim is chosen at random, they will send an inspector out to check out the car with the tech. The claims adjusters are far from experts but basically the tech shows them whats broken, what the faults are, what diagnosis was done to lead the tech to call part X faulty, drive with the tech to show the concern can be duplicated and is legitimate, etc. The inspector will approve or deny the claim. They will not know if the car is chipped, they don't have access to that information unless the dealer specifically goes out of their way to tell them it's chipped, but the inspectors ALWAYS take pictures and document the car, a flash is invisible but they definitely take note of mods they can see. I've personally seen an inspector measure fender to ground height to make sure the suspension wasn't modified. Mods you can see will get claims denied quicker with extended warranty than they typically would with the manufacturer warranty.

Another thing to consider is not all extended warranties will cover the cost of the repairs. Whether you like it or not customer pay repair times are warranty times multiplied by 1.5 (or Alldata times etc, which will be similar), some extended warranties will only pay factory warranty times. If you bought the the warranty from the dealership doing the work they will usually honor what the extended warranty that they sold you is willing to pay. If you bought an extended warranty elsewhere and they won't pay out customer pay prices for repairs, you can expect to have to cover the cost difference. Customers tend to get upset about having to pay out of pocket when they have an extended warranty but the business is not going to lose profit because you bought a cheap warranty from somewhere else. A lot of people feel it's unjust but if you think about it logically, it makes perfect sense. If you have a 2010 GTI and you total it the insurance company cuts you check for 15K, if you walk into a VW dealer and you want a new GTI they aren't going to give it to you for 15K just because that's what your insurance company covered on your old one... you would take that coverage payout and you would pay the difference.
 
Chapter 8 - Extended warranty work on a modified car.

The way it's supposed to work is you bring the car in with a concern, you approve a diagnosis charge, they will prepare an estimate for the repairs and submit the claim to your extended warranty. If the bad part is not covered you will be charged that diagnostic fee you approved, if it is a covered item the warranty company will pay it and you don't have to. If it's a relatively cheap repair chances are they will approve it over the phone. If it's more costly, or if your claim is chosen at random, they will send an inspector out to check out the car with the tech. The claims adjusters are far from experts but basically the tech shows them whats broken, what the faults are, what diagnosis was done to lead the tech to call part X faulty, drive with the tech to show the concern can be duplicated and is legitimate, etc. The inspector will approve or deny the claim. They will not know if the car is chipped, they don't have access to that information unless the dealer specifically goes out of their way to tell them it's chipped, but the inspectors ALWAYS take pictures and document the car, a flash is invisible but they definitely take note of mods they can see. I've personally seen an inspector measure fender to ground height to make sure the suspension wasn't modified. Mods you can see will get claims denied quicker with extended warranty than they typically would with the manufacturer warranty.

Another thing to consider is not all extended warranties will cover the cost of the repairs. Whether you like it or not customer pay repair times are warranty times multiplied by 1.5 (or Alldata times etc, which will be similar), some extended warranties will only pay factory warranty times. If you bought the the warranty from the dealership doing the work they will usually honor what the extended warranty that they sold you is willing to pay. If you bought an extended warranty elsewhere and they won't pay out customer pay prices for repairs, you can expect to have to cover the cost difference. Customers tend to get upset about having to pay out of pocket when they have an extended warranty but the business is not going to lose profit because you bought a cheap warranty from somewhere else. A lot of people feel it's unjust but if you think about it logically, it makes perfect sense. If you have a 2010 GTI and you total it the insurance company cuts you check for 15K, if you walk into a VW dealer and you want a new GTI they aren't going to give it to you for 15K just because that's what your insurance company covered on your old one... you would take that coverage payout and you would pay the difference.

Very thoughtful and insightful thread! Thank you for taking the time to put this all together. I will say I was beyond impressed with VW when a coworker took his Passat in for a bad battery. He's owned the car from new for 7 or 8 years, only has maybe 65,000 miles on it and had replaced the battery at the dealer once several years ago. They gave him a brand new Passat to drive for the day and pro-rated the replacement battery so in the end it almost ended up costing him nothing, like maybe $80. Conversely, I had an almost new Dodge Ram Cummins Turbo Diesel with MAJOR electrical problems (7 months old, 7500 miles). They had to keep it for a week. I had to fight the GM of the dealer to get a loaner and in the end, they honestly tried to say my new Samsung Galaxy Note 4 phone being paired to the truck was the problem! They even called me one day and said "We think it might be your phone that's causing the problem" to which I said "is it still throwing connectivity codes right now?" - "Yes sir" - "OK, I'm 35 miles away, IT'S NOT MY PHONE!".

This is why I went back to Toyota. Should have never left in the first place.
 
It seems crazy to me given the complexity of today's cars that people still try to "chip" them. If you want more power, save your money and by a faster vehicle!

The thing I always find interesting is when lifting, in my mind you are changing things to operate out of the intended OE specs. Yet if a dealer tried to argue there was a drivetrain issue from lifting and wouldn't cover it, I think I'd have no hesitation pursuing with the argument pointing out all the dealers that install lifts. (I think partially what prompted this post)
 
The thing I always find interesting is when lifting, in my mind you are changing things to operate out of the intended OE specs. Yet if a dealer tried to argue there was a drivetrain issue from lifting and wouldn't cover it, I think I'd have no hesitation pursuing with the argument pointing out all the dealers that install lifts. (I think partially what prompted this post)

I'm not in any way trying to imply that a lift voids powertrain warranty. It still needs to be an effected system to have warranty implications. With a lift the effected systems would be suspension and drive line parts, brake lines and wiring harnesses to the wheel speed sensor, things like that. The MM Act conversation in that thread is mostly what prompted this thread, not the actual lift voiding powertrain warranty part.


It's like if you're running a distance race. Lets say you get a blister on your foot during the race and it starts to hurt. Naturally your form goes to shit and you try to minimize the pressure on the blister a bit and next thing you know your knee hurts, then your hip, then it's in your lower back hurting and shoulders are getting tense. You wouldn't think a blister on your foot could cause tensed up sore shoulders but it's all about the chain of how things effect eachother.
 
This is a good post. Hopefully it helps people understand how dealers and mfgs interact...

The thing about warranty is that you should not be modifying your vehicle if you can't afford to fix it if something related goes wrong.

And to follow that logic, you should not be off-roading your vehicle if you cannot afford to fix it when the inevitable broken parts happen in that very unpredictable environment. You also need to be a little self sufficient and know how to fix your own stuff if you plan to do a lot of off-roading adventures. It's not the best activity for the guy who drops off his car at the dealer to get everything done.... Maintaining and fixing the truck is pretty much part of it.

On the other hand, the mfg should cover unrelated things and provide some type of reasonable proof that the modifications caused the issue (and not simply throw up their hands and point at modifications). A lift can't really be related to a clogged catalytic converter or a bad MAF sensor... A bad wheel bearing or bent spindle.... sure, the lift "could" be related to that.

I do believe that dealers need to stop thinking they can make profit on every minute spent on a customer... Like every other business in the world, you have to eat some operating cost to build a relationship with customers... It will pay off 100x in the long run.

Bottom line (on the lift), A properly installed lift is not going to cause any problems in the warranty period unless you go out and beat the piss out of the truck off-road. In that case, it's your problem anyway.
 
Last edited:
Magnuson-Moss Act

I haven't read it from end to end as I'm not an attorney and would therefore not understand or misinterpret some of it's components.

I have read enough of it to believe that there are references to it on many car forums that indicate the poster(s) were clueless as to the power of this congressional act. Mention this law to any repair shop, be it dealer or independent and they'll play dumb. It's actually my belief that few if any of them, especially at the tech level, have a clue what it covers. Some have really never heard of it.

What's provided here is good information. Thanks for posting.
 
The Magnuson Moss stuff is spot on here.

I come from the fast car world and if I had a dollar every time I've heard, "Well herp derp, Magnuson Moss, they have to prove I broke my car, I'm not worried about my modifications!"
 
All great and factual information. Thanks for taking the time to share it with our community, Audi.

The only caveat is.... you have to find a dealership that will adhere to these practices. Or at least be informed enough to disclose the same facts.

Every service writer should start a potential warranty repair order with, "Mr./Mrs. Customer, I understand that your concern could very well be covered under the factory/aftermarket/extended warranty, there will be a $xxx.xx diagnoses fee that I need to have you approve. If in fact your concern is under the warranty, you will not be charged for the diagnoses fee. However, if it is determined that your concern will not be covered under warranty for x, y, or z reason, you will be responsible for the approved diagnoses fee."

Those of you in the automotive industry know for a fact that this isn't going to happen all across the board.
 
Great read!! I never tuned my Audi because of the TD1 Fiasco. I was waiting until I was absolutely sure the engine was solid before throwing away my warranty, but in the end I ended up selling it.

DSC02261_zpsac21cd79.jpg~original


As for more the "buy a faster car" comment. Modifications are addicting!! A simple software flash and a smaller supercharger pulley on the small 3.0 liter Audi engines gets +60-70 whp (360-380 total) and 11.6 @ 118mph quarter mile times in a 4 door 4000lb sedan.
 
So I was a mechanic forever and I would call customers a lot when my service adviser was busy. Just as an example when we did brake pads on older Volvos the master cylinder would once in awhile go bad from compressing the pistons. The customer would blame us. So I tried giving the heads up when I sold pads on an older car. Big mistake. It would just turn into a whole friggin conversation forever when they would ask how much the master cost etc. Just a bunch of whining for something that may not happen. No writer in his right mind is going to open up a can of worms and piss off every person he talks to when they come in for warranty. Its much easier to fade the heat when the problem of a not covered item comes up.
 
All great and factual information. Thanks for taking the time to share it with our community, Audi.

The only caveat is.... you have to find a dealership that will adhere to these practices. Or at least be informed enough to disclose the same facts.

Every service writer should start a potential warranty repair order with, "Mr./Mrs. Customer, I understand that your concern could very well be covered under the factory/aftermarket/extended warranty, there will be a $xxx.xx diagnoses fee that I need to have you approve. If in fact your concern is under the warranty, you will not be charged for the diagnoses fee. However, if it is determined that your concern will not be covered under warranty for x, y, or z reason, you will be responsible for the approved diagnoses fee."

Those of you in the automotive industry know for a fact that this isn't going to happen all across the board.

I agree completely.

All dealerships are not created equal and over the years I've seen a lot of shitty people come and go and the amount of people who try to do things the easy way instead of the correct way is astonishing. The final straw that made me leave VW (more specifically, the dealer I was at) was when they hired a tech who was just fired for selling customers work they didn't need and then keeping the parts to sell on the side while claiming he did the work the customer paid for. They knew that's why he was fired and they brought him into a shop I was supposed to be in charge of anyway. I left very shorty after. He's no longer works there because, big surprise, he's still a piece of shit thief. He, like almost every other tech **from what I've seen in my personal experience** that didn't make it at a dealership, ended up at an independent shop.
 
So I was a mechanic forever and I would call customers a lot when my service adviser was busy. Just as an example when we did brake pads on older Volvos the master cylinder would once in awhile go bad from compressing the pistons. The customer would blame us. So I tried giving the heads up when I sold pads on an older car. Big mistake. It would just turn into a whole friggin conversation forever when they would ask how much the master cost etc. Just a bunch of whining for something that may not happen. No writer in his right mind is going to open up a can of worms and piss off every person he talks to when they come in for warranty. Its much easier to fade the heat when the problem of a not covered item comes up.

I'm not quite sure I follow the story above. You're prepping for a master cylinder failure based on experience and a common failure. But in the end the customer is whining about the master cylinder that might fail and be angry about the warranty on his older Volvo?

This is the problem with younger inexperienced service writers.

Although, you may be a great technician, it doesn't sound like you've had the training to be a good service writer. A good service writer will take the time in the beginning of a relationship to create trust. He/she should explain to the customer the possibility of the master cylinder failing based on experience. If this is in fact a true concern on Volvos, there are probably a ton of information available online from similar experiences. It is in the best interest of the service writer to do that research so that he/she can present it to the customer when the time comes. And if it's an extremely common issue with replacing brakes on a Volvo, you should only have to do the research once and create a pdf file to print out during every Volvo brake pad replacement.
 
As for more the "buy a faster car" comment. Modifications are addicting!! A simple software flash and a smaller supercharger pulley on the small 3.0 liter Audi engines gets +60-70 whp (360-380 total) and 11.6 @ 118mph quarter mile times in a 4 door 4000lb sedan.

We've had our Audi for 8 years, probably get another in a few. I don't really like cars and my wife drives like a grandma, never been a problem, hahaha.
 
My point is that 90 percent of the time if they come in for warranty it will be warranty. It is best to explain to the 10 percent that it isnt a warranty issue after finding this out for sure. They will understand. Why spent a large period of time with every customer causing anxiety that they may have to pay and waist your time with long explanations when you need to just get them on their way and get yourself back to work. I guess you just have to live this to understand it. Im just saying in the real world this is a MUCH smoother process because people get upset, want to argue etc. all for not when its a low percentage that it will come up.
 
herp derp?? Really?

The Magnuson Moss stuff is spot on here.

I come from the fast car world and if I had a dollar every time I've heard, "Well herp derp, Magnuson Moss, they have to prove I broke my car, I'm not worried about my modifications!"

If you're referring to my post on the other forum, I take offense to the "herp derp" as if you are somehow implying that I am an idiot. But, it's the internet and I expect that. I was simply trying to be helpful.

If you read what I actually wrote, I said a minor mod like a level spacer should not void an entire powertrain warranty and in another post noted that the M/M act specifically prohibits dealers from saying "these parts are only OK if WE install them" which is true. I also said if you have a bunch of back yard engineering done on your ride, you're going to have trouble. I never once came close to implying any and all mods are perfectly fine because of M/M... Common sense goes a long way.

Even AudiTech agrees that a level kit shouldn't void a power train warranty... At the end of the day, the dealers can't just do whatever they want. If they could you'd hear, "I'm sorry sir, those new RainX Wiperblades are not O.E. we're just not going to be able to cover your leaky oil pan gasket." All things within reason is all I was suggesting.

herp derp, I think not.
 
Last edited:
I did not get the impression he was talking about your post but I fully agree with him. Damn near everything you see posted on forums in regards to the MM Act applying to cars is just idiots making noise.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,125
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top