Gamma Ray
Banned
That's a lot of fine words but to my recollection only one country has ever actually used nukes.
In my defense, I never said that Americans weren't twats :lol:
That's a lot of fine words but to my recollection only one country has ever actually used nukes.
In my defense, I never said that Americans weren't twats :lol:
Edit: And I should add, people are selfish twats. Don't be a stupid, selfish twat. Don't be selfish. Your mom raised you better.
I like to remind people here that if they believe CO2 causes global warming and PUTIN MAN BAD then they should be in fits of joy that oil and gas are so expensive.
"This IS what you wanted, right? Or are you just a disgusting hypocrite virtue signaler that forgot actions = consequences?"

So, when it was cold (freeze last year), it was due to global warming. It is hot now…and this is due to global warming. We all know that all of this is from ozone destruction due to hairspray, right? My grade school teacher taught us that. She can’t be wrong 20-30 years later, right?
You talk big…….but do you walk the walk?
Given that Russia has shown to be a paper tiger in terms of military prowess & technology, NATO and USA fearing Russia’s might is overstated. I am pretty sure ANY NATO country will destroy Russia’s army within a few days if not sooner.
Given Russia military gross incompetence due to decades of corruption, any nuclear launch will probably self-detonate before leaving the missile bay!
The Russian units involved are not engaging in pure fighting. More of a limited police action by reserve soldiers. Any NATO country? I beg to differ and I'm basing that on my 24 years of service. Most of Russia's nuclear deterrent is their mobile launchers which roam freely (they hide well), not missile bays.
There’s such a thing as too much sun for solar panels, and Europe’s solar industry is starting to buckle
You cannot make this up! Europe…just one bad decision after another….
Yeah, let us follow their idiotic agenda. Go Greta!
Did you actually read the article? ALL electricity generation sources operate at reduced efficiency at high temps - nuclear, coal, gas are included in that.
Your infatuation with a teenage girl is odd.
No. That's no supposed to be solar's strong point. The lack of emissions/pollution/whateveryouwanttocallit is. (of course, that doesn't solve what to do with them when their 20 yr or so lifespan is over)But you miss my point…….what is the point of solar when it “throttles” just like old tech under the very conditions that is supposed to be its strong point?
Yes, age is relevant for me. I don't fixate on children.Age is not relevant for me…is it for you?
We need to push for Green Energy b/c that's the only way we can innovate to improve it. Should we abandon all other sources of energy while we make that push? No. Should we abandon coal as much as possible (globally)? Yes.The push for Green Energy is done without much understanding of realistic needs of the people. It is the middle class that suffers greatly from this push.
No. That's no supposed to be solar's strong point. The lack of emissions/pollution/whateveryouwanttocallit is. (of course, that doesn't solve what to do with them when their 20 yr or so lifespan is over)
Yes, age is relevant for me. I don't fixate on children.
Your beef is with the media. Not a teenage kid.
We need to push for Green Energy b/c that's the only way we can innovate to improve it. Should we abandon all other sources of energy while we make that push? No. Should we abandon coal as much as possible (globally)? Yes.
Should we be investing in Nuclear? Yes.
Being extreme about it in either direction is a bad plan. That pretty much goes for anything in this life/world.
Yes, age is relevant for me. I don't fixate on children.
Your beef is with the media. Not a teenage kid.
Not cool what you're insinuating here. She's 19 FFS. Not a 'minor age' teenager and certainly not a CHILD.