sn0wrunner
New member
No disagreement there. I'm sure Josh is tired of all the drama. But it needs to be known that Gobi has him by the balls. And it is messed up that they are trying to cover their tracks.
No disagreement there. I'm sure Josh is tired of all the drama. But it needs to be known that Gobi has him by the balls. And it is messed up that they are trying to cover their tracks.
Not sure how far this story has made it outside of the 4Runner world, but I think the Land Cruiser and Jeep communities should be aware of what happened here so that they have something to think about when choosing a roof rack.
I think a company like GOBI should have less lawyers and more fabricators! 6 week lead time for a rack from a company with 30 employees?
Especially as they are suing Baja Racks over their FJ cruiser ladder. Anyone already a member there?
I think a company like GOBI should have less lawyers and more fabricators! 6 week lead time for a rack from a company with 30 employees?
They are also suing BAJA Rack over their Wrangler roof rack.
It's hard to build racks when you are busy suing everyone!
I've been telling everyone I know regardless of vehicle make. All have said they have continued to pass it on through off road clubs etc and have removed Gobi as a potential buy. I think the FJ forum should be made aware too. Especially as they are suing Baja Racks over their FJ cruiser ladder. Anyone already a member there? ID2000 could get away with suing Sears and Home Depot over cell phone cases, but in this instance they have picked on someone who is part of a tight knit community and that crap just doesn't fly. Wrong group to mess with Gobi!
Source to that?
Source to that?
Source to that?
I wonder if anyone here would know how to get this story on the front page of Jalopnik. The IP address part will give people laughs if anything.
Intelligent Designs 2000 Corporation v. CCM Assembly & Manufacturing Inc. dba BajaRack Adventure Equipment patent lawsuit
I wish someone did... I've emailed Andrew, the editor for the TruckYeah section twice, the first time he told me it had already been brought to his attention and he was looking into it. Never heard anything else then I sent another this morning after seeing the Yahoo finance article.
As stated. It would be fine if the old threads weren't deleted....again.Can I make a suggestion of compromise here guys?
I think we shouldn't involve/drag Josh/WMW into these conversations as the sole source of evidence. The case has been resolved and whatever the terms are, we'd more than likely be putting pressure on WMW/Josh by constantly holding him up as our martyr.
IF everyone wants to continue to point out the egregious issues in ethics, business practices, and morality that GOBI/ID2 have and continue to exhibit; we should do so from an objective point of providing evidence alongside the most recent case as to show more of continuous pattern of behaviour. Rather than setting up all these threads to seem as almost retaliatory to WMW/Josh's case.
I'm all for pointing out and exposing the poor practices of a company (it's been done many times over the years with various companies on this forum and many have improved as a result of it it seems.) But we shouldn't be dragging someone into the fight who may not want to be in it.
Why can't we respect what Josh wanted?
And stop spreading FUD, and witch hunt. None of what you said are "facts". Now, who "just won't quit"?
No one is "beaten", no one "win", no one "lose". There may be some "mis-communications" along the way, but this is win-win situation for everyone, they met, and came to an agreement. Isn't that exactly what all you guys have been talking about? "Have a conversation, and everyone get back to work"....
I think we shouldn't involve/drag Josh/WMW into these conversations as the sole source of evidence. The case has been resolved and whatever the terms are, we'd more than likely be putting pressure on WMW/Josh by constantly holding him up as our martyr.