Lineman
New member
Cabowally,
1. I'm armed services as well (17 years) across the pond numerous times.
2. I've been divorced too. What people need during this time are facts.
3. I don't sugar coat with people.
4. The same could be said for you.
5. Everything I stated to him was fact or intended to help him out. You cannot argue that.
So your statement of, "Don't worry about the belt. As you can see, there are a number of owners not worried about the belt well into the low 100k range. The vehicle will be fine".
That's a pretty bold statement. It should be accompanied with guarantee to pay for an engine if his belt goes.
We all know the 4.7 belt in the 2003 is due at 6 years or 90K miles. So why all the sudden is it a surprise to people? This doesn't sneak up on you, you know from the time you buy. If the belt was to go at 91K miles, you'll kick yourself in the butt for not changing and your buddies wouldn't give you "man hugs" because you forgot or didn't have the money.
1. I'm armed services as well (17 years) across the pond numerous times.
2. I've been divorced too. What people need during this time are facts.
3. I don't sugar coat with people.
4. The same could be said for you.
5. Everything I stated to him was fact or intended to help him out. You cannot argue that.
So your statement of, "Don't worry about the belt. As you can see, there are a number of owners not worried about the belt well into the low 100k range. The vehicle will be fine".
That's a pretty bold statement. It should be accompanied with guarantee to pay for an engine if his belt goes.
We all know the 4.7 belt in the 2003 is due at 6 years or 90K miles. So why all the sudden is it a surprise to people? This doesn't sneak up on you, you know from the time you buy. If the belt was to go at 91K miles, you'll kick yourself in the butt for not changing and your buddies wouldn't give you "man hugs" because you forgot or didn't have the money.