Sound like you need a CCW for that neighborhood.
Sound like you need a CCW for that neighborhood.
sadly we are living in an age where criminals are beginning to have more rights than victims. there was a case in canada where a homeowner shot a man in the middle of the night breaking into his truck (with a knife on him). he was acquitted and then the court overturns the acquittal and he has to go to trial again.
someone in the middle of the night in pitch darkness breaking into property or a house immediately is a deadly threat. do you really want to chance it that a burglar doesn't have a firearm on them? some of these judges are so removed from reality in their gated communities - they have NO idea how fast someone with a knife or blunt object can close the distance on a firearm. castle doctrine better prevail and get this waste of tax payer money case thrown out. it's been 4 years and it's not concluded... and as a tax payer this just pisses me off
:rofl:Sound like you need a CCW for that neighborhood.
:rofl:
A gun provides zero deterrent for PNW tweakers. Better to carry some meth to offer for trade in return for your things back.
Nope, not in NJ either. We aren't allowed to protect ourselves because "personal protection" isn't a worthwhile reason to conceal carry a firearm. The GOV has so graciously allowed us to own them after jumping through all the hoops, but we can only bring them to a range and back home. It's jail time for us, otherwise.
And yes, I know the case in NY just happened that says that is not a justifiable reason, but I'm sure NJ will find a way to not allow it. Time will tell, but I'm not optimistic, especially with our current regime in office here.
That's a whole other conversation however...
I pulled my truck out of the garage left it running, got out and went to the back of the truck in garage to get my dog in the crate, as Im putting the leash on the dog I hear someone jump in the front seat, I immediately know whats up but because my garage is so narrow and the 4runner is wide, I have to run around through the house to the front door to get outside adding 2-3 seconds. he slams the door shut as I bust out of my front door and floors it, I give a good chase but run into the recycling bins in the alley and he just floors it out onto the main street, didnt even slow down, mfer got really lucky.
Very sorry for the OP.
That said, the idea as suggested of using a firearm to defend against property theft with no reasonable threat of bodily harm based on the description of circumstances is not a good one and would likely result in a conviction.
Very sorry for the OP.
That said, the idea as suggested of using a firearm to defend against property theft with no reasonable threat of bodily harm based on the description of circumstances is not a good one and would likely result in a conviction.
He tried to run me over , BLAM , BLAM, BLAM, looks like Im the only witness.:sniper:
Good call, there's no way they would have figured out the fleeing thief was shot in the back
As other, more coherent, members have already stated: shooting someone in the act of stealing insured PROPERTY when your life (or someone elses) isn't in immediate danger is the wrong decision and will end poorly for you more times than not.