33's without the Body Mount Chop

I dont have an SAS truck. I have a truck that came with a solid axle, it's not a swap. Do you know ANYTHING about vehicle nomenclature? Anything?..

The whole intent of my reply was to establish the fallacy in your claim that everyones an idiot except you. Regardless of the races you've done, the thread is about tire size and it has devolved into someone named muffdog whipping his cock out to compare to everyone else's.

Furthermore you asked for pictures of the trails I've driven when I named the trails for you. Google them. For Gods sake just google.

So I'm not going to respond again if you reply because you are obviously one of the dumbest people I've ever spoken with. Instead I will leave you with the facts nobody is disputing except YOU:


You are not the "end all be all" of tire sizes.

A tire with a 33 inch diameter is a 33.

You're a dick.

You discount the opinion of individuals who the 4x4 community has deemed reputable and knowledgeable.


Reply if youd like but I'm done commenting to a re-tread like yourself.

Literally 60% of everyone I come into contact with (including you) is an idiot who is trying to fake it until someone who is actually talented catches them in the act. Not surprisingly, I don't agree with you because I am certain you are literally an uneducated slob who uses online forums to feel important and has zero engineering chops. You would never post dumb stuff like you have a $39 spring over conversion. Who does that??

A tire which does not have the numerals: "33" on the side is not a 33. By convention, when you order one of those tires at any shop in the United States including the one nearest you, the size you get is 33x12.5.x17 unless its a special order width or a metric size which are both different. In that case everything I posted about fitting a 33 is correct. You (and everyone else) who posts anything to the contrary is just 100% wrong.

You are right, I did type SAS by accident. The majority of my responses were baiting you. You failed, unsurprisingly.

I don't care if you think I am a dick. I can't hear you over my FIRST PLACE TROPHY. :flipoff:
 
Literally 60% of everyone I come into contact with (including you) is an idiot who is trying to fake it until someone who is actually talented catches them in the act. Not surprisingly, I don't agree with you because I am certain you are literally an uneducated slob who uses online forums to feel important and has zero engineering chops. You would never post dumb stuff like you have a $39 spring over conversion. Who does that??

A tire which does not have the numerals: "33" on the side is not a 33. By convention, when you order one of those tires at any shop in the United States including the one nearest you, the size you get is 33x12.5.x17 unless its a special order width or a metric size which are both different. In that case everything I posted about fitting a 33 is correct. You (and everyone else) who posts anything to the contrary is just 100% wrong.

You are right, I did type SAS by accident. The majority of my responses were baiting you. You failed, unsurprisingly.

I don't care if you think I am a dick. I can't hear you over my FIRST PLACE TROPHY. :flipoff:

Not really wanting to get into it, but simply stating, when I bought 285/70R17 Falken Wildpeak AT3Ws before the Yokohamas I have now, it literally verbatim said (33) right on the side. Just like that, literally right on the sidewall next to the "metric equivalent" numbers. It's obviously not as wide as a 33x12.5x17 but it is the same height.

Besides all tires are slightly different sizes even in the 33x12.5x17 size range (see how I used the term "range"). If you took a 33x12.5x17 BFG KO2 and put it next to a 33x12.5x17 Nitto Open Country A/T (or any other A/T) I guarantee that there would be at least some variation in height or width. Same could be said even more-so if you were comparing a 33x12.5x17 MT like a Trail Grappler vs an AT of the "same size". Even though they both say 33x12.5x17 right on the side, there would be no possible way that they would be identical height and width as their counterpart.
 
Not really wanting to get into it, but simply stating, when I bought 285/70R17 Falken Wildpeak AT3Ws before the Yokohamas I have now, it literally verbatim said (33) right on the side. Just like that, literally right on the sidewall next to the "metric equivalent" numbers. It's obviously not as wide as a 33x12.5x17 but it is the same height.

Besides all tires are slightly different sizes even in the 33x12.5x17 size range (see how I used the term "range"). If you took a 33x12.5x17 BFG KO2 and put it next to a 33x12.5x17 Nitto Open Country A/T (or any other A/T) I guarantee that there would be at least some variation in height or width. Same could be said even more-so if you were comparing a 33x12.5x17 MT like a Trail Grappler vs an AT of the "same size". Even though they both say 33x12.5x17 right on the side, there would be no possible way that they would be identical height and width as their counterpart.

valid point. I can tell you that is not my experience. BFG mt2 33 measures exactly the same as general grabber 33 and exactly the same as pro-comp xtreme 33. I have all 3 and they are within +/- 1/16th of an inch. I will submit that some manufacturers are janky and should refrain from fraudulent sizing of their tires. I could see how it saves them material costs to falsely label their tires a popular size that the consumer has heard of.
 
I used to run 33x9.50R15 BFG muddies on my Patrol, then switched to 33x10.50R15. They still make the 10.50 in KO2. Super Swamper make a 33x13.50 LTB too I think.
 
Can you get Patrols in the US?? Im a fan
Hard to get. In the US they did sell the 60 series Patrols from 1966 to 69 though. I had a 77 G60 in Australia. The current model Patrol is sold here as the Nissan Armarda, but without all the cool off-road tech.
 
33s will not fit without a BMC if you plan on doing actual offroading. I had bald falken wildpeaks in the 285/70R17 size with stock 5th gen trail edition wheels. They fit fine on road but I definitely could make them scrub if I tried hard enough. I also don't run a front sway bar so FWIW that may have had something to do with why mine scrubbed because I had more travel


Negative I have 2018 trd off road with stock premium wheels with 6112 front and 5100 rear with 285/70/17 Toyo open country RT and stock uca with no rub on road or off road
 
I have a 2018 trd off road stock premium wheels 285/70/17 Toyo open country RT”rugged terrain” tires 6112 front 5100 rear and running stock UCA no rub on or off road
 
Embrace it

57003_W3.jpg
 
I have a 2018 trd off road stock premium wheels 285/70/17 Toyo open country RT”rugged terrain” tires 6112 front 5100 rear and running stock UCA no rub on or off road

Cool story.

This is the 4th gen forum. What works on your 5th gen doesn't necessarily work on a 4th gen.
 
2006 SR5 running KING 2.5 lift with 285\75\16 KO2's AND Shrocworks bumper
Result - It WILL require a BMC and cutting off 1"-1.5" portion of OEM bumper cover at front lower wheel area otherwise you will definitley get a rubbing contact of the rear of the tire rubbing on the lower shock body mount. Photo isnt the best angle but the BCM did the job so that 285\75\16's work!
 

Attachments

  • bay 2021 3.jpg
    bay 2021 3.jpg
    150.4 KB · Views: 396

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top