i gotta ask , how does it keep up with the FJ's ?
These are the Bfg Mud terrain KM2 / Not the regular Mud terrain the tread blocks are different and they are pretty quiet for what they are / they are Soft and wont provide the Mileage as say the All terrain Radials do .I went with a 255/85/16 instead of a 265/75/16 Ive found ( In my Opinion ) the 4 runner prefers tall /skinny vs. a wider say 285 tire the Atrac Seems to work better without the Wider rotating mass. the reasons I get stuck are not due to tire width !! Also I air down to say 15-18 psi when wheeling ( which I do ALOT of ) and the 85 Profile is actually a 33" tire as well. Mileage takes a Hit with the taller tire But I could care less about that. But they Stick very well on rocks etc.
These are the Bfg Mud terrain KM2 / Not the regular Mud terrain the tread blocks are different and they are pretty quiet for what they are / they are Soft and wont provide the Mileage as say the All terrain Radials do .I went with a 255/85/16 instead of a 265/75/16 Ive found ( In my Opinion ) the 4 runner prefers tall /skinny vs. a wider say 285 tire the Atrac Seems to work better without the Wider rotating mass. the reasons I get stuck are not due to tire width !! Also I air down to say 15-18 psi when wheeling ( which I do ALOT of ) and the 85 Profile is actually a 33" tire as well. Mileage takes a Hit with the taller tire But I could care less about that. But they Stick very well on rocks etc.
No argument...Just my personal preferance/ observation from using the different tire sizes. Iprefer it for Just that what I perceive to be better atrac function.I've not heard this argument for tall and skinny, any other (than improved Atrac) reasons why you prefer it?
Nice 4R, btw.