KCcarguy
New member
Being green is not limited to emissions, but glad to hear your point nonetheless.
Here is what it means to be green in building construction, and I think it is the same in car manufacturing.
Being green means:
1. Efficiency
2. Durability
3. Low embodied energy
4. Lower environmental impact
5. Less or no air-borne pollutants
In cars, I am not an expert, but it probably is easy to see where that may apply. Better fuel consumption, lower emissions, longer vehicle life, environmentally friendly finishing material, more power for less energy, higher safety standards, etc..
What to hate about that?
Absolutely nothing if it can still haul five people and all my gear/ luggage, tow my boat, and occasionally drive across rough terrain. I would LOVE for there to be such a vehicle, but for now it's just not reality. I'm sure the next 4runner will be better in at least categories 1 and 5, but by how much? If it becomes a crossover with a macho bodywork, it loses it's whole reason for existing, IMO....why not just get a highlander. Even if it retains all the positives of the current model with, let's say a 20% increase in efficiency, is that really worth another 5 years of payments? That should really be up to the consumer.
Speaking of environmental impact; I'd be curious how much of an increase in efficiency would be required in a new vehicle to offset the impact of the new vehicle itself being produced vs just keeping an old one over a 5 year period. Anyone?
Last edited: