TeryT said:Has anybody had this checked & is it a must at 60k? It is in the book to do.
Thanks & I hope that is the case! The "Passport to Performance" scheduled maint. guide says to "Inspect the Following: Engine Valve Clearance". It gives no exceptions for the V8 - CAN ANYBODY ELSE VERIFY?SWUtah said:Valve adjustment is not a maintance item at any mileage on the V8. Don't let the dealer screw you with this unneed service.
Just got back from the dealer. This is a shim over bucket setup. Being such, they are manually adjusted by changing out the shims.
Yes, this is lame. Good for performance and reliability - Bad for the pocketbook. I've heard anywhere from $400-700 to do a valve adjustment.
Has anyone had their Toyota valves adjusted and what were you charged?
Inspect valve clearance (audibly)
Not the answer I wanted!sharp4runr said:It definitely says to inspect the valve clearances so I say you should get it done.
[/B]
Thanks, but the link didn't work.SWUtah said:If you want, post this question on www.ihmud.com 100 series fourm. I also have a 1999 Landcruiser with the same engine that is in my 2004 4runner V8. Some of the LC owners have 100 series with over 150K miles on them and "NO ONE" checks the valve clearence and no one has ever had a problem with burnt valves. The 80 series has the same shim set-up and calls for a valve clearence check at 90K miles. I had a 1995 80 series and checked the valve clearence at 100K miles. They were well within spec. and the mechanic said that if I want to check them again at 200K miles but he doubted they would need adjusting. What happens with the shim set-up is that the valves get quieter as they go out of adjustment (tighten up) which then can cause a burn value. The thing is the shims are very very hard and never wear down to the point that you will burn a valve. But as they say it is your money so spend it like you got it.![]()
The way the book says to check the valve lash is to do audible inspection by listening for excessive valve train noise and then check for an uneven idle.
If the lash is excessive there will be a ticking noise that you can hear. If the lash is to tight the valves will not close all the way and you will loose compression and that will present as an uneven idle. If either of these conditions exists you then must physically check the valve lash with a feeler gauge.
The FSM will give you the minimum and maximum lash for each valve. You properly position the cam and then check the lash with a feeler gauge and keep careful notes of what valves if any are out of spec.
Once you have checked them all the next step is to remove the shims from the followers that are out of spec. This is done using the Toyota Special Service Tools (SST). Once the shim is out, use a micrometer to measure its thickness. Then look up the thickness of that shim and the lash up in the chart in the FSM and it will tell you what size shim to replace it with to achieve the proper lash. Normally each shim will usually need to be ordered. The downside here is that you will need to reinstall the out of spec shim before rotating the cam to the proper position to remove the next shim. You must never let the cam lobe touch the follower without the shim in place.
Once you get all the out of spec shims out and measured and you have the new ones ready in install just remove the out of spec ones and reinstall the new ones. Simple, right??
TeryT said:Founds this on a thread over at Tundra Solutions forum that sums it up:
Tundra Forum Thread
So the audible IS the 1st step. If anything sounds lick clicking, or there is rough idea, do the inspection! I wonder what my stealer would say?
Bascially guys on the Tundra forum were saying you could easily go 2 - 3 times that long without more than 1 or 2 of the valves being out of adjustment - maybe this will be a 90k check (visual that is) along with the timing belt perhaps?
I'll sleep just fine! But didn't YOU say that nobody checks this!? :awais:SWUtah said:Tery
You need to do the inspection. You will never sleep if you don't check the valve clearence, go for it.
Lifter Article (Automotive Rebuilder.com)In contrast, an overhead cam engine uses variations of the hydraulic lifter with followers and lash adjusters but no pushrods. The performance market prefers mechanical and mostly roller styles. OEM builders typically prefer the hydraulic versions because they require less service for the vehicle's owner and need virtually no adjustment yet they can be used with both flat tappets or rollers. The performance market prefers mechanical and mostly roller styles.
[Hydraulic lifters] are not without their limitations, however, as [they] usually cannot handle too much in the way of higher rpms and performance. You must consider their extra weight for both the reciprocating weight of the lifter and its effect on the cam. This added weight actually ends up working against the hydraulic lifter in those situations, adding yet another weak spot to an already vulnerable valve train. Another factor to consider is functional geometry and how a lifter can or cannot be controlled. The OEMs want the most they can get from a lifter so they use them to run up to their service envelope and not beyond, as in high performance conditions.
TeryT said:I'll sleep just fine! But didn't YOU say that nobody checks this!? :awais: