I was able to get my new suspension picked up from the US and installed this past week.
My old setup:
OME 881 (without top-out spacers), OME comfort shocks/OME 890 with the "comfort" rear shocks
Hub-to-wheelwell measurements:
F:21.5"
R:23"
My new setup:
New TRD Tundra coils, Bilstein Tundra 5100's/LC 8 wraps, Tundra Bilstein 5100's
I set the Tundra coils on the 2nd notch -> hoping to get about 2.5-2.75" of lift.
Hub-to-wheelwell measurements:
F:23"
R:25"
20111022-IMG_0519 by
Headlight Hookup, on Flickr
Here are my CV angles (with Toytech diff. drop) after the fronts were installed:
20111022-IMG_0522 by
Headlight Hookup, on Flickr
Here are the 8 Wraps:
20111022-IMG_0521 by
Headlight Hookup, on Flickr
BEFORE Stance (OME):
20110920-IMG_0268-2 by
RickaShay24, on Flickr
AFTER Stance (Tundra/LC):
20111028-IMG_0524 by
Headlight Hookup, on Flickr
YES, the truck is pretty raked but it doesn't look as bad in person. I know that the LC coils take a few weeks to settle and should sit about .5" lower after some use. Right now, the truck has ~1.5" of rake and I'm hoping it will have just over 1" after it all settles. Either way, the rake will be eliminated when the truck is loaded up and used for it's intended purpose: wheeling!
I actually have yet to install the Bilstein rear shocks as the Tundra ones come with a 1/2" eye shock bushing, we need 3/4" for the 4Runner. I installed some OME 60027 shocks I had lying around for the time being, but the shocks will not affect the height of the lift.... I have new bushings in the mail and the Bilstein rear shocks will be installed next week hopefully.
Once I get the rear Bilsteins installed and wheel with the truck I am going to start a thread and talk about the differences between the two setups. My initial impressions (even with the STIFF OME 60027 rear shocks) are the ride is definitely more plush, especially the back! Which is really why I ditched the OME in the first place. Some people like the ride of the OME, but I was not too fond of it.