I'm not seeing how a law preventing using your phone while driving would effect me being that I know not to do so.
But I agree that stronger training and testing is needed. And since you're comparing the two, would you also say that stronger training and testing would benefit gun laws?
If we all took just a little bit of responsibility for our own actions the world would be such a better place.
If we agree to have strong gun training do we need a course to be put in place for cell phone use training?
I would imagine more people are killed because of cell phone use annually than guns. How many car accidents happen daily due to cell phones. Daily. It's staggering if you think about it.
I would say the best comparison would be gun training vs driving training.
Aww but driving isn't a right. Freedom of travel is but not driving.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
^LOL the more apt comparison would be to driving in general, not phone use.
EDIT: Hepar beat me to it.
I agree with you there. I'm not the one who brought up the comparison though.
My intent was not to compare it to driving. I used driving as a example of when reckless cell phone use could and does cause great damage. Hope this clears it up. Sorry for any confusion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
those types of laws are very similar to anti-gun laws. the only people it will affect is those who choose to obey the law.
I mean originally. It was Nevada who first made the comparison.
This is just plain creepy...he is a Taliban supporter and his only issue with what his son did was that it should have been left to Allah.
Father of Orlando shooter attends Clinton rally, touts candidate | Fox News
.