FoneRunner
New member
This thing looks pretty awesome...although I'd like to see it run some trails before I shell out $80k!
FOXNews.com - Review: 2010 Icon CJ3B
FOXNews.com - Review: 2010 Icon CJ3B
This thing looks pretty awesome...although I'd like to see it run some trails before I shell out $80k!
FOXNews.com - Review: 2010 Icon CJ3B
yeah, I would rather have something like that than some jeep even modded that everyone and their mom drives....
I mean seriously, 3/4 of the Rubicons in town here I can tell will never hit a dirt road let alone a trail. Thats one reason I prefer the 4runner, there are lots around, but not many modded to go offroad. (of course we are kinda changing that by helping so many people mod their 4runners, Last weekend SteezeMcqueen put a lift in a 5th gen. and the owner plans to take it 4wheelin!)
Ok, 3/4 of Rubicons never see dirt? If this stat is even true, then how is it different than 4runner Trail? Or Land Cruiser? For me, i don't care whether it is common or not as long as it does its job well. Isn't that what matters the most to a seasoned off-roader?
Do you read before you comment??
I said "HERE IN TOWN" and there are a ton of Rubicons in my area, and you can tell by the drivers and jeeps themselves, that they have and never will go off road,
and the difference is you dont buy an old Landcruiser FJ unless your gonna either show it or take it offroad. people that buy FJ's know what they are buying,
The fact that the Rubicons are now a dime a dozen means they are far from original and the fact that they arent making it off road indicates that the people that are buying them dont have a clue how capapble they are offroad.
my point was that you show absolutely no originality by buying a Rubicon, you show no originality buying a 4runner, but a modded 4runner is far more original and creative than a modded jeep.
for example your former wheeling rig is far more original than a Jeep Rubicon, whether or not it is more capable, didnt seem to matter does it? just like, Im not concerned that my 4runner is more capable than a Rubicon, it serves my purposes needs and catches far more eyes than if I was in Rubicon.
So, to recap for those that dont read the whole post, my point was that the new Icon is by far a much more original/creative choice to go wheeling in or even DD than for example a Jeep Rubicon which may or may not be more capable
Maybe it's my age (35), but originality is not all that great. It is actually one of the main reason why i sold my G...it attracts too much attention when in public...and not all attention is good (for family safety). In fact, in 2004, when i was shopping for my next SUV, my top 3 at the time: GX470 KDSS, G500, and Rubicon, in no specific order. Unfortunately, in 2004, the Rubicon (TJ-based) did not come with ABS, which is one of my requirement. GX was not all that different (in capability) than my 2002 4runner. IF the current Rubicon was available back then, then i would have gotten it in a heartbeat...in fact, if the 2010 4runner Trail was available in 2004, then i would have gotten it before the Rubicon.
For a similar reason (lack of originality), this is why i own a $42,000 minivan and not a Lexus RX350...it blends nicely in a Walmart parking lot. I used to be paranoid with my Mercedes...it got annoying afterawhile.
In other words, i rather buy something that is capable, than something that is original. And i don't care if soccer moms drive it. Oh yeah, cheap to maintain is great also.
Walmart is the place to be. Remember, Target is a FRENCH company. In Texas at least, Walmart has self-checkout lanes, which is pretty fast!