This bracket took me a couple hours to tweak. Is it perfect? No. Does it incorporate enough rotational adjustment for cutoff leveling? Yep, shore does. But I saw an issue...
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/185141496@N07/49190673088/in/dateposted-public/" title="Retro"><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49190673088_17ba3f813a_c.jpg" width="800" height="450" alt="Retro"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/185141496@N07/49190671298/in/dateposted-public/" title="Retro"><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49190671298_04bb4e157c_b.jpg" width="1024" height="576" alt="Retro"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
After mounting it up back in the housing and test fitting the chrome shroud, I did not have much clearance between the projector lens and the plastic. Secondly, I was worried that spacing the lens forward the thickness of the bracket was goign to affect tuning and clarity of these puppies.
So I did the rational thing:
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/185141496@N07/49191365072/in/dateposted-public/" title="Retro"><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49191365072_4f903b9e3c_b.jpg" width="1024" height="576" alt="Retro"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>