Back window / rear of 4Runner is always dirty.

Name calling? What name calling? Are you referring to my "goober" comment?


That's hardly name calling. Think of it has a NASCAR thing.

Don't blame me if people live with the rear spoiler fallacy.
 
Fourty-four said:
Name calling? What name calling? Are you referring to my "goober" comment?


That's hardly name calling. Think of it has a NASCAR thing.

Don't blame me if people live with the rear spoiler fallacy.

You don't have to have an attitude abotu things. I work in the NASCAR inudstry so I know exactly what you are referring to, but you can still be civil.......like I said, if you can't be civil, go somewhere else........simple as that.
 
AlexJet's response works for me. :)

My back window is the first part of the truck to dry off when driving after washing it and not drying by hand.
 
Fourty-four said:
Name calling? What name calling? Are you referring to my "goober" comment?


That's hardly name calling. Think of it has a NASCAR thing.

Don't blame me if people live with the rear spoiler fallacy.

I opt to have this thread closed.
It's been taken waaay off-track by someone who obviously uses his IQ for his username.

(errr, not you momo.75)
 
Only on the internet do you find that special breed of person who thinks he's qualified to argue with experienced scientists and engineers just because he reads Car and Driver and watches NASCAR.

:bs:


Yeah, close this thread or just ban the sucka.
 
atomic punk said:
I opt to have this thread closed.
It's been taken waaay off-track by someone who obviously uses his IQ for his username.

(errr, not you momo.75)

Hey mods!!! :awais: Don't look now, but atomic punk just violated the forum rules!!

Being the fair and equal mods that I know you are, I think his post justifies a fair and equal warning.
 
loner said:
Only on the internet do you find that special breed of person who thinks he's qualified to argue with experienced scientists and engineers just because he reads Car and Driver and watches NASCAR.


Just for the record, I don't watch NASCAR. I can honestly say that I've never watched an entire race. I find it too boring after 10 minutes, unless there's a crash:zoom:
 
atomic punk said:
I opt to have this thread closed.
It's been taken waaay off-track by someone who obviously uses his IQ for his username.

(errr, not you momo.75)

Some people just don't get it......
 
Fourty-four said:
Hey mods!!! :awais: Don't look now, but atomic punk just violated the forum rules!!

Being the fair and equal mods that I know you are, I think his post justifies a fair and equal warning.

........and I don't need help from you either. There are plenty of other forums you can go to.......:hello:

I am pretty fair wehn it comes to trolls, but it is pretty black and white with me. Either play by the rules or you don't........you've had your warnings, now it is up to you......;):
 
Fourty-four said:
Hey mods!!! :awais: Don't look now, but atomic punk just violated the forum rules!!

Being the fair and equal mods that I know you are, I think his post justifies a fair and equal warning.

You're right, spoiler god. I was out of line. There was no just cause for me to type that, I'm sorry if I offended you or your spoiler demigods. I wasn't aware that you can dish out sarcasm but not take it. Shame on me for thinking you were an intelligent, mature, thick-skinned person. I was wrong. My fault.
...that being said,it's too bad you can't suck it up and apologize to those you might have offended and just relaaaaax dude.....
 
atomic punk said:
You're right, spoiler god. I was out of line. There was no just cause for me to type that, I'm sorry if I offended you or your spoiler demigods. I wasn't aware that you can dish out sarcasm but not take it. Shame on me for thinking you were an intelligent, mature, thick-skinned person. I was wrong. My fault.
...that being said,it's too bad you can't suck it up and apologize to those you might have offended and just relaaaaax dude.....

You are not helping the situation.......this thread is done.......
 
teotwaki said:
AlexJet: I just wanted to say thank you for the polite and informative posts that avoided name calling and baseless accusations.

Have you seen any numbers for the Cd of the 4Runner? I tried some Googles but had trouble finding a published number.

Thanks!!

Hey Jim, nice to meet here another aviation engineer.
Unfortunately, I couldn't find Cx value for 4th Gen. 4Runner. I'll try to contact Toyota HQ and ask them to release this data. It shouldn't be a secret.
 
The drag coefficient (cd) for the 4R is 0.39, I remember seeing it somewhere before. Little details like that just stick in my mind for whatever reason :D
 
Last edited:
Hank said:
The drag coefficient (cd) for the 4R is 0.39, I remember seeing it somewhere before. Little details like that just stick in my mine for whatever reason :D

Wow, it's not that bad. I was thinking of something close to 0.42
 
AlexJet said:
Wow, it's not that bad. I was thinking of something close to 0.42

The trick would be to get them to give before and after Cd or Cb numbers regarding the illusory benefit of a spoiler.
 
teotwaki said:
The trick would be to get them to give before and after Cd or Cb numbers regarding the illusory benefit of a spoiler.

Agreed, but I don't think they will give us (customers) both numbers.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top