mteolus
New member
If you mean -10 with 4.3 inch backspace it is everyone with SCS wheels. I haven't found a wheel with -10 4.1. Shouldn't make much of a difference anyway.
Best offset to be flush with 285s
- Thread starter replica9000
- Start date
If you mean -10 with 4.3 inch backspace it is everyone with SCS wheels. I haven't found a wheel with -10 4.1. Shouldn't make much of a difference anyway.
Motory
New member
If you're talking about the 17x9 -38 3.5BS, there is no way those will fit without modification. If you're looking at putting those on you should probably be prepared for bumper trimming, fender liner mod, mud flap removal and bmc. But damn they look so good
Last edited:
mteolus
New member
F5's have had the 17x9 -38s for a while so you should be able to ask someone who has them. Should be the exact same with the new Ray10s.
Akkording
Member
I have almost the same specs but with -10 offset Level 8 MK6. To me with the 285 Wildpeak I notice tire wall poke past the fenders.
mrblah
Senior Member
Not only does flush depend on what tire brand you choose and what offset rims you decide to run, your eyes may play tricks on you, depending on how you view a vehicle from straight ahead or from the rear or from the sides.
FLUSH
https://www.toyota-4runner.org/atta...0d1551841649-best-offset-flush-285s-flush-jpg
POKE:
https://www.toyota-4runner.org/atta...51841722-best-offset-flush-285s-not-flush-jpg
Rims spec: f5 17x8.5 -12 offset w/ 1.25 spacers, which puts my offset close to -40.
IMHO: 0 offset is flush with the fender (depending on tire), but not when viewed from different angles.
-12 offset gives you a little bit of pokage (depending on tire) and look flush from most angles.
-38 gives you about 1 and 1/2 inches of pokage (depending on tire), and will also look poked out when viewed from most angles (except when I take a photo of my rig from the front or rear).
FLUSH
https://www.toyota-4runner.org/atta...0d1551841649-best-offset-flush-285s-flush-jpg
POKE:
https://www.toyota-4runner.org/atta...51841722-best-offset-flush-285s-not-flush-jpg
Rims spec: f5 17x8.5 -12 offset w/ 1.25 spacers, which puts my offset close to -40.
IMHO: 0 offset is flush with the fender (depending on tire), but not when viewed from different angles.
-12 offset gives you a little bit of pokage (depending on tire) and look flush from most angles.
-38 gives you about 1 and 1/2 inches of pokage (depending on tire), and will also look poked out when viewed from most angles (except when I take a photo of my rig from the front or rear).
Attachments
Last edited:
Akkording
Member
With 285 on 8" wide -10 offset your tire tread will be sitting directly under the fender. The tire wall poke will be exposed beyond the fender.
I recommend you maxing out your caster above 4.0 with after market ucas to prevent body mount contact on reverse full locked decline driveways turns. You might hear a slight front fender liner rub but that can be remedied. Freeway driving would feel solid as well.
Yes tire models like bfg k02 will have a skinnier profile but you get the idea. I believe it's more accurate to judge the poke from the rear with the assistance of the the body lines but yes our eyes do play tricks on us.
My buddy has the f5 -38 and he required a bmc on 285 70 17 C nitto ridge grapplers. Caster set to D: 4.2 P: 4.4
I recommend you maxing out your caster above 4.0 with after market ucas to prevent body mount contact on reverse full locked decline driveways turns. You might hear a slight front fender liner rub but that can be remedied. Freeway driving would feel solid as well.
Yes tire models like bfg k02 will have a skinnier profile but you get the idea. I believe it's more accurate to judge the poke from the rear with the assistance of the the body lines but yes our eyes do play tricks on us.
My buddy has the f5 -38 and he required a bmc on 285 70 17 C nitto ridge grapplers. Caster set to D: 4.2 P: 4.4
northcoast
New member
I know to each their own, but I think your set up looks perfect.
replica9000
New member
At the moment, I'm considering one of these sets of rims to go with Cooper S/T Maxx 285/70 or 285/75
17x9 -6mm
Pro Comp 69 Series Vintage, 17x9 Wheel with 6 on 5.5 Bolt Pattern - Flat Black - 7069-7983 | 4wheelparts.com
17x8 0mm
https://m.tirerack.com/wheels/Wheel...Runner&autoYear=2018&autoModClar=TRD+Off-Road
Does anyone know if the rear brakes are smaller allowing to temporarily test fit a 16" wheel?
17x9 -6mm
Pro Comp 69 Series Vintage, 17x9 Wheel with 6 on 5.5 Bolt Pattern - Flat Black - 7069-7983 | 4wheelparts.com
17x8 0mm
https://m.tirerack.com/wheels/Wheel...Runner&autoYear=2018&autoModClar=TRD+Off-Road
Does anyone know if the rear brakes are smaller allowing to temporarily test fit a 16" wheel?
replica9000
New member
Honeybadger96
New member
I'm new here. This post has been giving me some great info. I have a chance to get a set up of 275/70r17 fallen wild peaks on a set of 17x8.5 fuel wheels with 4.5 back spacing and a -6 offset? Everything I've seen is for 285s... will that set up work stock without spacers no rubbing? Thanks guys.
mteolus
New member
The answer is it might. Every vehicle is different, but I would say odds are it will not rub. You won't know until you put them on. If it does rub some, it will be an easy fix (fender liner mod).
Last edited:
Are you using JBA off-road UCAs? What suspension? What mods did you have to do to prevent rubbing? Thanks
Jacabbysal
New member
I have 285/70r17 with wheel that is 9" and offset at 18mm, leaves me with a backspace of 5.71.
I had to modify the fender liner and take off the mudflap, with that I have zero rub.
I had to modify the fender liner and take off the mudflap, with that I have zero rub.
Yes i have the JBA arms with caster set at 4 degrees, the suspension is the OME 3" lift with heavy springs up front. I also took off the stock mud flaps as it rubbed ever so slightly in reverse at full lock
Matteblack
Member
I'm looking to change to 17x9 0 offset with 285's, anyone have that set up and can share a pic? Thanks
