Martinjmpr
New member
No problem at all. All input (relevant or not) is greatly appreciated!!
I understand your viewpoint, certainly if you've decided you want a 4runner, by all means, I'd say get it. As for the 4 cyl vs 6, if the 4 was available with a manual transmission like it was back in the 3rd generation days, it could be a fun vehicle but a vehicle that weighs nearly 5000lb with a 4 cyl and an automatic sounds like it would be a slug to drive and from what I'm seeing the MPG difference is negligible.
That being the case, the only advantage I could see to the 4 cyl is you might get a slightly lower initial cost. Of course, when it comes time to sell, you will also get less for it, so ultimately I'd call that a wash. :shrug:
I think Thai makes a good point about "safety" though. A lot of times we make assumptions about safety that aren't neccessarily true (bigger is better than smaller, trucks are better than cars, etc.) Modern CUVs and wagons are amazingly well designed and have to undergo rigorous crash testing. The unibody design lends itself well to distributing the effects of a crash over a large area, and of course the CoG difference by itself can be a huge factor in preventing an accident in the first place!
Obviously, there are a lot of choices out there. If it were me, and I lived in SoCal, I'd probably keep the 4th gen V8 for shorter trips and get something a bit more economical for the wife. Those 200 mile daily trips will siphon money out of your wallet in a hurry when gas gets back up to $4 a gallon, and you know it's only a matter of time before that happens.