leftyguns21
New member
out of curiosity i googled it but only read one article
i store mine in a manner where it could not accidently go off. often times its in a locked glove box, safety on, no rounds chambered and magazine in a separate location. i never leave vehicle unlocked or firearm in plain site.
If the gun is used to intentionally commit a crime, to kill or injure someone, the court will not impose civil liability on the gun owner for the acts of a third person. Again, under the proximate cause doctrine, the actions of the thief would supersede the negligence of the gun owner, cutting off his liability
The courts...generally view the shooting another person as unforeseeable act for a lawful gun owner who simply forgot to secure their weapon. "It's unfair and unjust to hold that person responsible
a gun owner could find him or herself in court if the stolen gun is negligently discharged. LeCesne described it as any subsequent use of the gun that injures because of lack of reasonable care: sticky-fingered kids goofing around, someone picking up the weapon and accidently pulling the trigger or a fumbling thief who doesn't know how to use a gun
The question is whether the gun owner could have reasonably foreseen that the weapon could accidently harm someone if left unsecured. It's similar to leaving a gun lying around in the open.
i store mine in a manner where it could not accidently go off. often times its in a locked glove box, safety on, no rounds chambered and magazine in a separate location. i never leave vehicle unlocked or firearm in plain site.