Uneek
Super Moderator
I think you guys are missing my point. The goal isn't to line the pockets of politicians. Though that might happen, and get abused like every other program. I am just brain storming about how we pay for the deficit. I was presenting this scenario with the idea that the tax would be temporary and handled as intended only.
It's too bad we have to worry so much about politicians doing the wrong thing with tax money. Nonetheless, it happens in every gov't.
I wonder what the gas prices will be in 10 years. 11 Years ago it was .89 cents a gallon. In ten will it be 8 or 9 dollars a gallon? At what price do we start taking alternative means of power more seriously? Maybe I should convert my engine to propane.
What we should do is cut programs and services... I don't have a problem with paying for what I use. Send me a tab for what I use. If my house is on fire, I'll sign an IOU, otherwise, let it burn.
The problem is the administering behind programs and services that lines their pockets.
I don't expect to get any retirement aid when I retire and I'm contributing into a something that won't be there and I have to plan for my retirement now decades in advance. Hell, I'll be lucky if my folks get Social Security, I'm not expecting it.
Programs and services foster laziness and people's lack of ambition to make something of themselves and abuse these services. Why should someone go and work when they collect welfare or food stamps and watch soaps all day? We can give 90% of our income to taxes and it won't fix squat. The mentality of laziness, not "we need help until we're back on our feet" will just keep us continuing down this rabbit hole.
Gas was about $1.60 to $2 in 2000 here.