So the problem is the 285 and not the 75?
I thought the problem would be the sidewall height.
What would be a better choice? My truck is 100% stock. Im going camping in 3 weeks and its going to be very muddy. Want a tire with more traction, might as well go a little bigger at the same time.
Any suggestions? Was looking at Toyo Wildpeak
The 285 is the width, so at full steering lock, the edges of the tread are what rub on stuff. So, yes, the 285.
If you want something with more traction ASAP, get a 275 series tire instead of a 285. People are doing 275 with maybe a front splash guard push. No lift, no mbc, no nothing. 275 is very safe and gives you obviously 10mm more width.
I'm currently running 285s with a 2.5 lift up front, 2 lift in the rear and no aftermarket UCAs. I have heaps of space up front around the front splash guard, but I rub at full steering lock -gets way worse if the suspension is compressed while at full lock.
I'm trying to see if I can get away with maxing out my caster angle in my lower control arms. If that doesn't work, I'll get aftermarket control arms.
One thing to keep in mind is that 4runners are like finger prints in how they respond to lifts and bigger tires. Assuming people are going with 285s, one person might rub up front and others may not. Some people report just needing UCAs and no body mount chop and others say they needed both (UCAs and a BMC). So, it's a bit of a toss up. Also know that there's something called "driver's side sag" with our 5th gens where the driver's side is actually lifted more than the other corners from factory because it's heavier. That's probably why I'm only rubbing on my driver's side front and not my passenger side.
$0.02. There's a lot to plan out so I wouldn't rush to get a quick solution otherwise you may end up paying for things 2 or 3 times over.