First off - I just re-read the article and it has been extensively modified since I first read it. A majority of the information has been removed and the article reduced to about 1/4 of its original size...so I understand why it doesn't make sense to you.
However, there are a few things, irregardless of the article, that need to be explained.
How does distributing the swine flu vaccine encourage eugenics IN ANY WAY?
It doesn't encourage EUGENICS...I said Eugenics
proponents (key word here). These people, like Bill Gates, are proponents OF eugenics.
Why does it encourage them - Because those people willingly took the H1N1 vaccine. I personally skipped it, got the swine flu, and was over it in 3 days. My reward - a stronger immune system and the knowledge that swine flu won't kill me, lol.
The blog/piece does not actually backup any of its claims or even rationalize this line of argument.
I didn't write the piece - again, it has been significantly modified since I read it.
Eugenics is a powerful word that indicates prioritization or elimination of certain ethnicities, using the term in any academic setting is pretty frowned upon.
Eugenics is defined as (from dictionary.com):
the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).
NOTHING in that definition regarding certain ethnicities, although some eugenicists in history have definitely used ethnicity as one of their "desired" traits in selecting which segment of the population to target (i.e. Hitler).
The reason I attacked the piece is because it MAKES NO SENSE and does not even make an attempt to justify its claims. Specifically the claim that a vaccine will somehow cause de-population of certain peoples, which is does not do, hence my earlier question: who died?
:ybrick:
Whether or not someone died is not the issue here.
FYI, there are deaths from the flu vaccine along with some very, very negative side effects for some people.
Still Want Your Vaccine After Watching This Video - YouTube
h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-insert-admits-it-causes-guillain-barre-syndrome-vasculitis-paralysis-anaphylactic-shock-and-death
300 Deaths from 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine, ONE death from the Swine Flu
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease-Leaked-letter-reveals-concern-neurologists-25-deaths-America.html
I agree with you - the altered piece definitely lacks a lot of things that made the original piece quite informative.
The issue at hand is the same however:
1. The Gates Foundation is funding nanoparticle vaccines that activate when they come in contact with perspiration.
2. More importantly - This is a HUGE human rights violation. It is MY decision and only mine whether or not I want a vaccine. Bill Gates does not get to make airborne vaccines and force them upon humanity just because he has the funds to do so.
Even if the vaccines "helped" people, the right to decide what goes into YOUR body is your choice and NO ONE else's. If we can't agree on that then you should probably move to a country where they will tell you what you can and can't do for your entire life. I personally enjoy the freedom we have in this country to choose for ourselves.
It all comes down to personal liberty and freedom.
I know all about stocks splitting. I was expecting "A $10,000 investment in Apple stock 25 years ago would be worth more than $950,000 today. A $10,000 investment in Microsoft more than $2.8 million.
