installed OME 906 rear coils

finished. 906's and billies. i like the lift as well as the handling. fronts coming soon! will i need spacers in the front with the 99 talls? also, the right rear is 36 1/4 and driver side is 36 9/16. is that normal for one side to be higher?
View attachment 96151

How are things going now? It looks like I'll have the exact same setup as you . I got my silver 4x4 2000 SR5 a month ago, with a 100% stock suspension on it. I'm replacing the rear springs with 906s (keeping original front springs), and Bilstein 4600s all around. I can't believe those factory shocks were still on it when I purchased it.

I'd love to do it all by myself, but I'm getting a mechanic to do the full installation. Considering we will have the exact same setup, is there any special advice I should give to my mechanic when he installs them?
 
finished. 906's and billies. i like the lift as well as the handling. fronts coming soon! will i need spacers in the front with the 99 talls? also, the right rear is 36 1/4 and driver side is 36 9/16. is that normal for one side to be higher?
View attachment 96151

Glad to see the tread is still alive. Yes the left side sits about a half inch higher. I have no idea why. I loved the setup with the 906's. Definitely better that the HD OME's as far as ride and I didn't want a huge lift for my wife to complain about. I sold my 4Runner about 8 months ago. At least the guys I sold it to sends me pics every once in a while. I ended up getting a new sequoia, nice but it ain't the same
 
How are things going now? It looks like I'll have the exact same setup as you . I got my silver 4x4 2000 SR5 a month ago, with a 100% stock suspension on it. I'm replacing the rear springs with 906s (keeping original front springs), and Bilstein 4600s all around. I can't believe those factory shocks were still on it when I purchased it.

I'd love to do it all by myself, but I'm getting a mechanic to do the full installation. Considering we will have the exact same setup, is there any special advice I should give to my mechanic when he installs them?

man, do it yourself. it is not that hard nor does it take that long. well, if you can't, tell him to do it right.
 
updates??

How are things going now? It looks like I'll have the exact same setup as you . I got my silver 4x4 2000 SR5 a month ago, with a 100% stock suspension on it. I'm replacing the rear springs with 906s (keeping original front springs), and Bilstein 4600s all around. I can't believe those factory shocks were still on it when I purchased it.

I'd love to do it all by myself, but I'm getting a mechanic to do the full installation. Considering we will have the exact same setup, is there any special advice I should give to my mechanic when he installs them?

Bump.... how has the 906's and the stock fronts held up?
 
Keep getting confused with the choice of Bilstein 4600s vs. 5100s

My 96 3rd gen is getting a suspension replacement. My plan is 99 talls on the front, and OME 906s on the rear. Will the Bilstein 4600s suit this? I'm not looking for a bigger lift or so, just a decent suspension system running a little higher than stock.

Thanks!
 
Keep getting confused with the choice of Bilstein 4600s vs. 5100s

My 96 3rd gen is getting a suspension replacement. My plan is 99 talls on the front, and OME 906s on the rear. Will the Bilstein 4600s suit this? I'm not looking for a bigger lift or so, just a decent suspension system running a little higher than stock.

Thanks!

I'll jump in! The coil setup you mentioned, (99 talls up front and OME 906 out back) is exactly what I'm planning. On another thread a member used Rancho RS9000XL shocks which are adjustable, at $150ea CDN they are about $20-$40 more than the Bilsteins but they are ADJUSTABLE. I tow, so the adjustable option is attractive to me. This member also said for a bit of $$$ you can retrofit the shocks to adjust them from inside the cab, rather than crawling under and turning the nob. I want to do a little more research before I pull the trigger.

By the way, the 4600 and the 5100 are similar, but generally, the 4600 (or HD) is designed for stock and the 5100 has more travel and is designed for upto a 2" lift. quote from their website:

Although they are different brands and may appear to be very different from each other the Bilstein 5100 and Heavy Duty actually share many of the same components and ride characteristics.

The main difference between the Bilstein Heavy Duty vs Bilstein 5100s is that the Heavy Duty or 4600 series is designed for stock height trucks and the 5100 Series is built for lifted trucks. The other major difference between the Heavy Duty and 5100 is that the Bilstein 5100 Series shocks have a zinc coating with a brushed metal shock body and a black boot while the Heavy Duty uses a painted yellow body with a blue dust boot.

The Similarities: The 5100 series and the Heavy Duty shocks use the same technology internally. Both use the same internal valving and at stock height will ride the same (shocks for lifted trucks may use different valving settings in order to accommodate the extra weight of larger tires). Both shocks are pressurized with 360 psi of nitrogen to prevent shock fade and foaming of the shock oil. The outer construction of both shocks is identical as well with an extruded metal body rather for maximum strength and top of the line seals. The 5100 series and Heavy Duty 4600 series are both covered under Bilstein's limited lifetime warranty that protects against any manufacturer defects for the life of the shock.
For stock height trucks, the Bilstein Heavy Duty yellow and blue shocks are the most popular choice, because they typically cost a few dollars less than the 5100 shocks and provide excellent performance for towing, light offroading or normal driving. Many customers do prefer the 5100 Series even on stock trucks because the shortest 5100s are typically built for 0 to 2 inches of suspension lift, meaning they can run the 5100 on their stock height truck but leave the option open for a lift later on down the road.

For leveled trucks, where the owner has either purchased an aftermarket leveling kit or turned their truck's torsion keys up, Bilstein has shocks designed specifically for a 1-3 inch leveling kit. On some trucks with coilover type front shocks, a Bilstein 5100 Leveling Shock is available that is capable of lifting the front of the vehicle up. We recommend using the 5100 rear shocks along with your front 5100s on leveled trucks because the rear 5100 shocks are usally an inch longer than stock to accommodate a small lift. In our experience, once someone gets a taste of lifting their truck, they always go back for more. If you already have the 5100 shocks on the rear, you always have that option without needing to buy new shocks when you decide to add the lift.
For lifted trucks, the Bilstein 5100 series is the only choice. With a few exceptions, all Heavy Duty shocks are designed only for use on stock height trucks. Bilstein 5100 shocks are designed for every size of lift for popular trucks, so whether your truck is a modified daily driver or an all-out offroad monster, there is a Bilstein 5100 shock to fit it.
 
I'm running Tundra Bilstein 5100 up front on lowest setting and Bilstein 5100 in the rear with OME 880/906 setup. Love this setup. Just a little higher than stock without affecting any other suspension components. Definitely better than my 179,000 mile original worn out suspension.

20160326_152443.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20160326_152443.jpg
    20160326_152443.jpg
    139.8 KB · Views: 3,311
I installed my 906 coils that had been sitting in my garage for a couple of months now and I call say I am very pleased with the coils so far. The PO had installed a 2" spacer lift in the rear and when I put the 906 coils in I was expecting a really firm ride like a lot of people had said but the ride quality was the same as the spacers but felt a lot more planted. I did loose about an inch of height but that will be fixed with some trim packers. I can't wait to see how these ride with the 2.0 fox shocks waiting to go. Definitely would recommend these coils to people who don't want to go with a full 3" lift.
 
Keep getting confused with the choice of Bilstein 4600s vs. 5100s

My 96 3rd gen is getting a suspension replacement. My plan is 99 talls on the front, and OME 906s on the rear. Will the Bilstein 4600s suit this? I'm not looking for a bigger lift or so, just a decent suspension system running a little higher than stock.

Thanks!


I'm running the Bilstien 4600 and OME 906, it rides pretty good. The ome 906 gave me barely any lift from stock height. Even though it says 2 inches.
 
great replies!

With the last 2 replies I'm feeling more confident about purchasing 906's and along with them, some Rancho RS9000XL adjustable shocks. Now for the front...

My fronts aren't leaking and don't feel too bad until I hit a speedbump, could this be the tired struts or springs? I'm thinking of replacing them with stock 99's or OME 880's or maybe staying with my old 98' originals... any opinions?? I measured my fender height unloaded and front and back are approx. 35" give or take a 1/2 an inch. Other members are reporting heights of 36-36 1/2" with the 906's---- we'll see if I fancy the 1 1/2" rake!
 
With the last 2 replies I'm feeling more confident about purchasing 906's and along with them, some Rancho RS9000XL adjustable shocks. Now for the front...

My fronts aren't leaking and don't feel too bad until I hit a speedbump, could this be the tired struts or springs? I'm thinking of replacing them with stock 99's or OME 880's or maybe staying with my old 98' originals... any opinions?? I measured my fender height unloaded and front and back are approx. 35" give or take a 1/2 an inch. Other members are reporting heights of 36-36 1/2" with the 906's---- we'll see if I fancy the 1 1/2" rake!

I feel you on questioning the front shocks... I'm in the same boat.... I hvae my 906 coils waiting to be installed... and my 5100's in the mail, My theory is I get to run the old coils on new shocks, If I think the shocks didn't do enough, I'll go look at front coils.

I shy'd away from the adjust Rancho 9000xl after reading too many people say'n they last about 6months off road... hence the bil's
 
I feel you on questioning the front shocks... I'm in the same boat.... I hvae my 906 coils waiting to be installed... and my 5100's in the mail, My theory is I get to run the old coils on new shocks, If I think the shocks didn't do enough, I'll go look at front coils.

I shy'd away from the adjust Rancho 9000xl after reading too many people say'n they last about 6months off road... hence the bil's

I appreciate your input! Unfortunately, I've already purchased the Rancho 9000xl's. I've read about failures, but most are really more to do with the remotes--- leaking lines and compressor failures. I don't plan on using remotes, I'm staying with the manual nobs. I don't off-road often, but I tow a sportboat, hence the adjustable shocks (and kids complaining about a jarring/bottoming out ride).

As far as the fronts are concerned, I'll have to save up! I'm reluctant to replace the struts only, because if its the springs that are the problem, I'll have to do the job twice! So I'll try out the rear replacements and see how it goes. AND see how the rake feels! If anyone has gone from their originals and replaced them with 99' stocks (which I understand are taller) up front, I'd be interested in hearing the difference, and how much higher their truck sits in the front (leveling out the slight height increase from the 906's). I'm not particularly interested in lifting my truck---- but from testimonial evidence, the 906's are the best option for towing and/or solving rear sag.
 
Last edited:
Reviving this old thread--thinking of staying stock in the front--but I'm sagging in the rear. Potentially thinking 906s in the rear with new-ish (1yr or so) KYB Gasajust in the back.

Any potential issues?
 
Reviving this old thread--thinking of staying stock in the front--but I'm sagging in the rear. Potentially thinking 906s in the rear with new-ish (1yr or so) KYB Gasajust in the back.



Any potential issues?



906 on the back and stock up front...that might be a lot of rake unless you already have lots of extra weight full time in the back. I got about 2" of lift on the rear with 906s


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Any potential issues?

I like a little rake, and don't think 1.5" rake is excessive. It all depends how much lift the 906 actually gives you- obviously.
Some have reported the 906 being pretty firm- maybe even harsh- but the shocks have a huge impact on ride as well, so take that with a grain of salt.
I know nothing about the KYB, but I loved the Bilstein 5100 with my Superflex coils, and HATE the ride with Bilstein 4600- so I know first-hand shock choice is extremely important.
This is with my front fender 38 1/8", and rear at 40" even-
8d61629ac289696cd24d54cbde3304e6.jpg

So, basically 2" of rake, and- personally- I don't think it looks excessive at all.
 
Just installed mine on a 96 with 5100 Bilsteins. Exactly 22" from center of hub. I only have 2k miles on them, but drove on some wash board and frost heaved pavement today. Vehicle was pretty skittish due to the stiffness...even got the WTF DUDE!!!! look from the wife. Definitely not a smooth ride, and lots of lost traction, not hating them, but I have some concern already for real driving. Perfect smooth pavement dirt roads they feel great.

If on a heavier vehicle such as a 1/2 ton truck I think they would be just about right....but the little, light, soccer mom SUV...a little stiff so far.
 
I had KYB gas adjusts with 906 and I measured 22.75" from hub to fender. It rode great with them. I would say just as good as my 5100's. Only reason I got the Bilstien's because I added 20mm spacers 10mmx2 per side. I wanted more rake. Here's a shot with 906 KYB and no spacers.

 
I have 906s and 5100s in the rear of my truck and it rides great. Apparently some people have issues with slightly stiff suspension here!
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top