My SR5 Build

well done! thanks for being the guinea pig on this.

they give you any insight on whether the front or back, or both, will settle over time? if so it might help out the rake - maybe 884's would be too tall after the break in...
 
EMU 883/895e coils

I did have it aligned after the spring install and the tech said it easily adjusted to within factory specs. Prior to the lift, my factory rake was 1.0" measured to the fender lips. Afterwards, rake is 1.5". I think the 884 springs might have been a better choice. ARB said the 884's are the same rate as the 883's, but 15mm taller. However, with the current rake and increased rear spring rate, I shouldn't have any sagging when loaded with camping gear.

Hey Fire,
Just wondering about your thoughts now that you've had the EMU set up for a while on stock struts & shocks. Have the struts & shocks topped out at all or disappointed you when used with these springs? Also, you mention the 884s above, which is what I'm considering (along with the 895s). Would you do anything differently if you had to do it all over again?
 
Hey Fire,
Just wondering about your thoughts now that you've had the EMU set up for a while on stock struts & shocks. Have the struts & shocks topped out at all or disappointed you when used with these springs? Also, you mention the 884s above, which is what I'm considering (along with the 895s). Would you do anything differently if you had to do it all over again?

Bump....inspiring minds want to know
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,075
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top