boston_kevin said:No rubbing, even at full lock.
No lift, but planning either OME or Daystar (since I don't do any hard core off-roading - mainly beach stuff)
best part - no slipping on snow/rain and even very good traction on ice.
Thanks
boston_kevin said:No rubbing, even at full lock.
No lift, but planning either OME or Daystar (since I don't do any hard core off-roading - mainly beach stuff)
best part - no slipping on snow/rain and even very good traction on ice.
Thai said:Based on what?? Some on here mentioned that REVOs don't do well in snow...so, where is your basis?? I hope that you do have something more concrete to back up your statements than in the past, Koz. Also, explain to everyone here why the REVOs do not have the snowflake symbol while other Bridgestone tires do.
Koz said:Relax tiger; everyone is entitled to their personal opinion. I owned both tires (BFG KO were the old compound) and the REVOs were better in every way. If you don't like my opinion, too bad, it's my opinion! There are also THOUSANDS of other owners that feel the same way in Tire Rack surveys. O that's right, Tire Rack is BS because they don't agree with you either, SORRY!
Koz
Koz said:FACTS!
REVOs rank better at; Hydroplaning Resistance, Wet Traction, Cornering Stability, Dry Traction, Steering Response, Light Snow Traction, Deep Snow Traction, Ice Traction, Ride Comfort and Noise Comfort. Let
Thai said:Where are all these "facts" come from, Koz?? Oh yeah, bias consumer reviews. Hardly concrete. Too many variables, too many bias possibilities.
And since you love sales figures so much (aka Tundra debate), why don't you post sales figures between BFG AT Ko and REVOs??Hell, you may be embarrassed...yet again!
Again, why is that you're avoiding an obvious question?? Why is that the REVOs do not have the snowflake while other Bridgestones do??? You claimed in the past that the snowflake is hogwash, yet Bridgestones do use it on some of their tires that qualify for severe snow conditions.
Anxiously awaiting your answer...and stop with this nonsense snowflake envy crap!
josh220 said:Does the speed rating really affect driving safety by very much? It refers to how fast you can drive on them right? I believe the Dunflops suggest a max speed of 80 or 85, but no one drives that slow in CA, you would get hit from behind if you did, even if you were in the slow lane. How fast can you drive on the BFG AT KO's? Those are going to be my next tires.
boston_kevin said:Koz and Thai - are you guys selling tires?
Koz - the new Bridgestone rep for the forum?
Thai - the new BFG rep for the forum?
You guys really go at it between these tires and the sales data for Tundra pickups... It's a new year, everything else is last year's news![]()
Koz said:With LT-ATs (speed rated at 86mph) I've traveled on section of highways where I had the cruise set at 105 mph for over a half hour at a time (several times) and no problems with the tires (they were new and set at near max inflation).
Koz
Falls said:So having the tires at near max. inflation is best for higher speed driving for long periods of time ? The hotter the tire gets wouldn't it increase in pressure , maybe beyond the limit.
No I'm not bashing (anything) , just wondering / trying to understand the speed thing.
Falls said:So having the tires at near max. inflation is best for higher speed driving for long periods of time ? The hotter the tire gets wouldn't it increase in pressure , maybe beyond the limit.
No I'm not bashing (anything) , just wondering / trying to understand the speed thing.