The chicken tax is why we get this POS version of the Ford Ranger, which hasn't changed since the 90s
Whether you agree with this particular tax or not, "Buy American" is not just jingoistic union BS. There's absolutely a benefit for every taxpayer to retaining manufacturing capability in the US - it drives higher wages, broadens the tax base, and provides strategic capabilities, just to name a few benefits.
I would love for Toyota to manufacture more vehicles in the US.
dont be mad that you frenchies only make Labatts and Hockey Pucks
Those aren't in production anymore. Last one rolled off the line December 22, 2011. :hatsoff:
Ford's Euro-Ranger has nothing to do with the chicken tax I don't believe.
It's the importing of Transit Connects they found a loophole for.
Although the T6 Ranger is offered in 180 markets globally, it is not currently planned to be sold in the United States or Canada,[2] due to the new platform being too close in size and cost to the F-150, and due to overall declining sales of compact pickups in North America. However, it is offered in the Middle East and Mexico in addition to the F-150.[3][4] Ford initially planned a mid-size truck based on a modified F-150 chassis for the North American market named the F-100;[5] however, this was shelved in favour of offering the 3.5L EcoBoost V6 engine on the F-150. Additionally, American and Canadian safety and emissions standards as well as the long-standing 25% import tariff imposed on non-American built light trucks prevent the T6 Ranger from being imported into North America.
Also Ford doesn't want to take away sales from the F150.
What this amounts to is a subsidy for domestically produced goods. I object to it because your government has set the precedent that it will combat similar practices in other nations as being unfair and prejudicial, but they are more than happy to enact this kind of legislation at home, and do so in nearly every industry from forestry and farming to manufacturing and tech industries.
What this amounts to is a subsidy for domestically produced goods. I object to it because your government has set the precedent that it will combat similar practices in other nations as being unfair and prejudicial, but they are more than happy to enact this kind of legislation at home, and do so in nearly every industry from forestry and farming to manufacturing and tech industries.
But I digress... :eyebrows:
Internet forums can sometimes have a tendency to exaggerate/embellish/amplify topics the way it comes across in this format. :blabla:
Had to do it.
Seems like a "tit for tat" game countries do to each other fueled by the various industry lobbyists to give them an advantage.
The chicken tax was a response to foreign tariff's imposed on a U.S. good.
Sure, it's protectionist. And other countries are equally at liberty to set their own protectionist policies, or negotiate with the US to remove ours, or whatever.
What you really don't like is that we've got the clout to make those policies stick and little brother to the north doesn't. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your righteous indignation.
perhaps you should read up on softwood lumber deals (or beef, or pork), or check Canadian duties on American made goods. Believe me, there are plenty of financial incentives for Canadians to buy Canadian products, or at least products from Canadian retailers. I'm not saying these policies are always a bad thing, but it is a huge piss off when prices are driven up artificially because of them.
Three pages and not one post by Greg, this thread is not worth reading
Yet
:snacker:
I think you missed his sarcasm
Three pages and not one post by Greg, this thread is not worth reading
Yet
:snacker:
Could be this is his day to work.
Wait .... I know .... Thai wore him out.