mistervague
New member
I'm thinking of the SF Bay Area specifically, but this question applies to anyone who lives in an area that gets NO snow or ice, but fairly regularly travels a long distance -- many miles -- to get to snow. Maybe every few weeks, but not constantly. Do you switch out your tires / wheels twice a year or just deal?
In an informal poll of friends, only one person I know actually switches to three-peak-snowflake winter tires for the 4 winter months. The rest just leave their so-called all-season tires on (and carry chains, which is often a requirement in California).
(This is unrelated to the question of whether anyone feels any "all-season" or "M+S" (non-snowflake) tires are good or bad for winter driving. It's just about whether you switch.)
I've been having this internal debate about it for years. Folks on this forum seem to like to be prepared but also practical. $1200+ for a separate set of tires & wheels is a lot when you would only "use" them a handful of times per year (and put thousands of highway miles on soft rubber) . . . but I'm sure it doesn't seem like so much when your family is spinning down the highway into a ditch or worse.
In an informal poll of friends, only one person I know actually switches to three-peak-snowflake winter tires for the 4 winter months. The rest just leave their so-called all-season tires on (and carry chains, which is often a requirement in California).
(This is unrelated to the question of whether anyone feels any "all-season" or "M+S" (non-snowflake) tires are good or bad for winter driving. It's just about whether you switch.)
I've been having this internal debate about it for years. Folks on this forum seem to like to be prepared but also practical. $1200+ for a separate set of tires & wheels is a lot when you would only "use" them a handful of times per year (and put thousands of highway miles on soft rubber) . . . but I'm sure it doesn't seem like so much when your family is spinning down the highway into a ditch or worse.