MTD
New member
It's looks good man! Did you figure out the supercharger stuff?
Thanks! I think we have narrowed it down to a nose cone so it should be taken care of on Wednesday when my parts get here
It's looks good man! Did you figure out the supercharger stuff?
You're using that for the main installation of the car seat? Using the latch system? That's not something I would chance with the safety of my child and if something happened where it failed and it was my fault instead of just using the seat belt. There is a reason that there is no company that makes a retrofit for the main anchors, it's too risky when the seat belt works just as well.
Um? It's either the seatbelt alone, or use those and the seatbelt. I just pulled out the backseat on our new Camry and I promise you a grade 8 bolt is equal or better than what is factory installed. And I did mention it was a secondary.
I'm not trying to be rude about it. I'm just looking out for your kid. You said it has "two safety attachments," that doesn't specify anything, it led me to believe you were talking about the two latches on each side. And if you look at your manual for your car seat it will more than likely tell you not to use both methods of installation at the same time. The seatbelt alone works perfectly. And I don't see where you said it was secondary in your original post. I'm sorry if I came off rude or mean, car seats for kids are a pet peeve for me because kids don't have the choice. I don't like when I see people playing Russian roulette with kids when they don't use the car seats as intended by the manufacturer; not installing them correctly or not tightening the straps on the kid. Again I don't want to seem like I'm attacking you, I just want what's safest for your kid.
I thought I typed it differently. Both is recommended, not necessary, the seatbelt is a primary and the two attachments are a secondary. After seeing what auto manufacturers use, I see no issues whatsoever with a 1/4" grade 8 bolt as a secondary.
The car seat manufacturer also says than you can just set an infant carrier in a seat without the base and run the seatbèlt over it, and all that holds it in is a small slot for the belt. With minimal force it can slide out.
I see this like a helmet. A dot approved helmet, can be a piece of crap but its still dot approved. Car seats are no different, there is a minimum.
Here is the official release of MTD's Build 2.0 "The ForeRunner". Supercharged 5speed fun for days!
![]()
Build thread buffeting...
Here is the official release of MTD's Build 2.0 "The ForeRunner". Supercharged 5speed fun for days!
![]()
Build thread buffeting...
Yeah that has always seemed like a joke to me to just put a seat belt over the top of the seat, I don't even know why that is still considered an option.
But actually both is not recommended, if you google it then you can see reasons why they say not to use both. I've never seen any manufacturer reccomend both. Here's a screenshot from one manufacturers website. It's the bold on the bottom. And here's the link About LATCH - Britax USA
<img src="http://i1350.photobucket.com/albums/p779/zacforsale/F5016747-075F-454D-B860-1BF35C48020F_zps8bdqxnc8.png" border="0">
I'll be the first to say it, that looks amazing!
Were you out taking pictures of random shirtless dudes again? At least your 4Runner happened to make it into the picture. haha
Coming along I see. I am sure it can't happen fast enough. Are you swapping diffs too? I am pretty sure the manuals are 4.10 and the autos are 4.30. It would be a free step in the right direction in terms of gearing if you plan to run larger tires.
We have a Chicco key fit. I have read the instructions several times and there is nothing stating that for our seat. I should have made the original post more detailed. Manufacturers are only required to test one restraint system. I have been all over the NHTSA and our manufacturers website, there is only one assumption, that a failure would/could occur due to a failure. Stating that the LATCH and the seatbelt "could" possibly cause a failure due to pressure on the same pieces. After an inspection/very in depth research prior to purchasing (several hours of research, and conversations with several retailers) we bought the chicco. I should have made it clear that the LATCH is used as a secondary and would only come into play if the seat belt either failed or for some reason the seatbelt was slow to lock, i.e. slamming on the brakes. One of the reasons for the purchase of the Chicco, is that it did not state "Do not use both" Just to double check my sanity tomorrow I am going to call the NHTSA and our seat manufacturer.
Honestly if we are in a crash bad enough for the seatbelt to fail it isn't going to be a pretty sight anyway. I would personally rather have some type of secondary, because if some slim chance that happened and the seatbelt did fail, could you live with yourself if you had the option??