nevada
Senior Member
FWIW... My '88 was registered as a station wagon in CA....
must have been a v6/auto.
FWIW... My '88 was registered as a station wagon in CA....
Nope not the same s10 is not a walk thru. Although if you want to get all crazy with the sawzall. You can make anything look like a fake of what they wish they had. :flipoff:
After all I just keep hearing about how the 2nd gen top can come off too. If it's not that cool why do it. :second: :jk: I do think you have one of the nicest mock 1st gens I've seen:wave:
must have been a v6/auto.ound:
I disagree. the removable top is a big deal.The only thing wrong with the 2nd gen is the 3.0 engine. Not a bad engine, but not a powerful engine. Yes the first gen can go topless. What good does that do you? It does two things: 1. Make you not as hot without the air conditioning. 2. Give you a better view around you. I use to own a Jeep CJ 7. It was to hot in the summer with the top on, and too cold in the winter with the top on. It just was not insulated the way it should have been. I had a lot of fun with it, but having a removable top does have its down sides.
Now I would not buy a second gen again, but stop using the removable top as your excuse. It isn't that big of a deal. Use the mechanics as an excuse, or anything else that is reasonable. Just don't hide behind the stupid top.
it was a 50/50 chance. lolnosir... 5speed 22re with a 2" lift and 33s...
The first step to recovery is never a step backwards. Toyota knew what they were doing when they improved on the 2nd gen and made the 3rd.
fixed![]()
So you agree that the 3rd gen is better than the first.
I dropped the universally agreed fact that the 3rd gen is superior to the... 2nd gen..., and left the 1st gen out of it.
Regardless, we all have our preferences to certain gens here, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Let's be honest. The '86-'95 trucks have the same wheelbase, similar(?) frame, same front suspension, same engine choice ignoring the turbo models, and different rear suspension and transfer cases. They're quite similar vehicles. It all comes down to whether you prefer the retro 80's hard lines and pop-top, or the passenger convenience of 4 doors, and interior differences.
Cosmetically superior? Matter of opinion. Mechanically superior? Depends on how much you bother to care about leafs vs coils in the back, and gear vs chain driven transfer cases.
We should all be happy we don't drive the rattletrap unibody $5 suv that is: The Jeep Cherokee (xj).
4 doors fit more whores.![]()
you must have missed it, I have TWO heaters.The hard top on a Jeep and a hard top on a Toyota are the same thing. The only difference is the position of the split. Yes you have a heater that works and keeps you warm with a hard top, but it has to work harder and takes more power than a heater in vehicle without a removable top. Do you rock crawl with your 1st gen? Because if that is the case, the 1st gen and the second gen serve completely different prepossess. You can't compare an orange and an apple can you? There is no doubt that the 2nd and 3rd gens are more of a family vehicle than the 1st gen. The have more comforts that come standard.
4 doors fit more whores.![]()
BTW - did a google search on 2nd Gen Toyota 4Runner and got this link!?!
IMDb: Top 20 Horrible Sequels Ever Made
:humble:
1st + 3rd = best gens