1engineer
Moderator
So I was in the same boat as all of you: Wondering why the engineers at Toyota saw fit to design the brakes and suspension of the SR5 4Runner like they did with noticable nose dive during intermediate to hard braking. Well, I think I figured it out this weekend.
I have had my 4Runner for about 3 months now and it is a fine vehicle in every way and I have 6K miles on it right now. The design of the brakes and suspension puzzled me however. I had some chores to do this past weekend and it involved several hundred pounds of various landscaping stuff like pavers, dirt, mulch, bushes, etc. Up til now the only loads in the back have been people and luggage and not a lot of that.
I put about 400 pounds of above landscaping stuff in the back and headed home. I immediately noticed the difference in braking and suspension. Everything was smooth, very little nosedive or anything else. I unloaded and went to a concrete place to pick up some sand and block. Had about the same weight and again everything was smooth.
It seems that the 4Runner, in regards to the SR5, operates much better and smoother with some weight in the cargo area. Was it designed that way? I think so. Is this the best solution? I don't know but it certainly drives, handles and brakes much better and different with a load back there. Anyone else notice this?
I have had my 4Runner for about 3 months now and it is a fine vehicle in every way and I have 6K miles on it right now. The design of the brakes and suspension puzzled me however. I had some chores to do this past weekend and it involved several hundred pounds of various landscaping stuff like pavers, dirt, mulch, bushes, etc. Up til now the only loads in the back have been people and luggage and not a lot of that.
I put about 400 pounds of above landscaping stuff in the back and headed home. I immediately noticed the difference in braking and suspension. Everything was smooth, very little nosedive or anything else. I unloaded and went to a concrete place to pick up some sand and block. Had about the same weight and again everything was smooth.
It seems that the 4Runner, in regards to the SR5, operates much better and smoother with some weight in the cargo area. Was it designed that way? I think so. Is this the best solution? I don't know but it certainly drives, handles and brakes much better and different with a load back there. Anyone else notice this?