Bluesky 07
Senior Member
Pulled the trigger on the Accutune stage 3 Fox 2.5 set up. Has Icon ucas and plus 1" springs. Does anyone have any info or experience with this setup?
I suppose you will soon. ;-)
Pulled the trigger on the Accutune stage 3 Fox 2.5 set up. Has Icon ucas and plus 1" springs. Does anyone have any info or experience with this setup?
hey im from Belize, and just wanted to ask if anyone has suspension parts their not using or want to give away, i would gladly accept them. for parts here in belize are very expensive, i would appreciate it so much. i bought my 4runner because i fell inlove with the 4runner community and ive watched so many videos about it that i had to get one with 200k miles on the dash and i have put a little money on it but i dont have the money for suspension parts. anything would be highly appreciated. my email is ([email protected])
I have an 04 SR5 that came with 16" wheels. Offset is 30mm.
Will 2015 Tacoma offroad wheels with 25mm offset fit?
Will be putting a 3.5/2.5 with SPC UCAs.
With that set up (3.5/2.5, SPC ucas, Tacoma off-road 16s) will 285/75/r16s fit?
2003 Limited V8. Bilstein 5100 all around (lowest/stock perch setting on front), OME 887 front springs (used, already settled), Toytec Superflex rear (new, not settled), 5th gen TRD Off-road wheels, 285/70/17 Falken Wildpeak MT tires. Stock UCAs. Only rubbing was front fender liners. A little massaging with a heat gun and we are good to go.
Quick question for all the suspension gurus. After installing some 5100s w/ FJ springs on the 'stock/bottom' setting, I got the truck aligned and the caster is already maxed out (roughly 1" of lift). I was hoping to to go up a setting to the .85" to level the stance out a bit more, but will I need UCAs to do so? Seems weird as I thought UCAs were needed more for 2.5-3" of lift. Could it be bad bushing instead? Looking for a little insight before I drop $650 on new UCAs.
Pulled the trigger on the Accutune stage 3 Fox 2.5 set up. Has Icon ucas and plus 1" springs. Does anyone have any info or experience with this setup?
Here is my experience with the Old Man Emu front struts advertised as "Stock/Light Duty Kit 1.5"- 2" Lift," and replaced with Bilstein 5100s at the 0.85 height setting (second slot from bottom for the C-clip).
My 2005 4Runner was completely stock, and too low. I did not, and do not care about appearance, e.g., "leveling" or "rake." I am not into cosmetic buildups. I am not a poser. Rather, being in the wildland-travel business, function and reliability are what I care about, as my three 4Runners have work to do.
Stock, it had about 8 inches from the front crossmember to ground. That is inadequate for a vehicle that is actually used to travel wildland roads, IMO. It is the location that often impacts roadbed rocks and ledges. So that measurement -- not wheel hub to lower fender lip -- is the distance that matters.
After installation, I found that the OME kit's advertised specs (1.5-2 inches of lift) substantially understated the actual lift all-round. The OME kit (884 springs and OME shocks, with a trim spacer on the driver front to address the known Toyota driver-side lean) put the actual front clearance at ~14.5 inches from the front crossmember to ground.
I liked the OME kit's handling and ride. The off-road performance was greatly enhanced. I even liked the bold look.
However, the truck immediately began emitting a low, harmonic, rotational groan when cold. The sound disappeared when I switched into 4WD, and after the drivetrain had warmed up. I don't know why.
Also, the OME kit's excessive lift put the CV axles at a substantial angle, upward from the wheel inward. So the boots tore VERY prematurely. As I drive a great deal on unpaved roads, and ford streams from time to time, the axles had to be replaced many thousands of miles before they should have been. (Please don't suggest that I could have just replaced the boots or installed boots for steep axle angles, changed the upper control arms, or added a differential case drop kit ... I had no interest in seeing matters metastasize.)
Also, I've been told that the excessive lift damaged the upper ball joints on both sides, causing an annoying suspension squeak ... meaning they now have to be replaced ($400+).
The lift also caused a loss of about 3-4 mpg in fuel consumption (down to 16-ish), which I anticipated.
Clearly, the OME kit's excessive and inaccurately described lift -- well beyond what ARB and the retailer still advertise for a stock/light-duty 4th gen 4Runner -- was causing problems that probably would only get worse.
So recently (April 2021), I had the OME front struts replaced with Bilstein 5100s, set at the 0.85 height setting with a quarter-inch Superior Suspensions-brand trim spacer (~$22) on the driver side to mitigate the common lean (due, it is said, to the battery and fuel tank being on that side, but I don't buy that). With the Bilsteins, I used the stock springs, which I'd kept. (Keep your old parts!)
(FYI, the springs are assigned specifically to the driver and passenger sides. Toyota color-codes truck springs with dabs of paint for the driver and passenger sides ... for 4th gen 4Runners, red & white is driver side; red & blue is passenger side. You can find Toyota's spring color codes here.)
The axles are now level, not angled. The harmonic groaning is gone. The ride is fine. While the front is much lower now, MPGs are now 19-20ish, occasionally better.
At the 0.85-inch setting, the Bilsteins put the actual clearance from the front crossmember to ground approximately 1.5 inch higher (9.5 inches) than stock. Again, stock was about 8 inches. (An aside: 9.5 inches is the same clearance as my stock, bought-new 1990 4Runner, which has been capable and reliable in very tough terrain and through years of hard use, and which I still have.)
This suggests that the next slot up on the Bilstein shocks -- advertised as 1.75 inch -- would probably exceed 2 inches actual. Bear this in mind if you are trying to determine the actual lift that will result from the several height settings available on the Bilstein 5100s.
Also bear the following in mind:
While the Bilstein 5100s are advertised as "adjustable," in reality that is kind of theoretical. This is due to the labor cost of making a change.
Changing the lift setting on Bilstein 5100s involves total removal and disassembly of the struts, plus front-end realignment. Expect to pay several hundred dollars for a shop to do it. (I will guess someone will chime in here with a DYI method.) If you don't like the change, you'll have to pay again to reset it.
I did keep the OME kit on the rear, since this 4Runner is often heavily loaded with long-term camping gear and supplies. For those concerned with looks, the truck looks good. (Photo is below.)
So, at this point, the Bilsteins are probably what I should have gone with at the outset. Going with OME was a costly error. My lo$$. I am disappointed that the actual results in my case were inaccurate and problematic. ARB, the manufacturer, does not accurately represent actual results -- and potential consequences. Nor did the reputable and very experienced retailer, who should know better. They just published -- and continue to publish -- ARB's inaccurate specs.]
I also had a similar experience with the OME 884's. I'm sorry I did not see Byways post earlier.
I used 5100's front and rear with the OME 884's on the stock (lowest) setting in the front and Toytech Super Flex springs in the rear. Putting the stock springs next to the 884's, the 884's were about 2 inches taller but after installing them I had a little over 5 inches of lift in the front. As Byways has noted the CV axle angle is very steep. Too steep to expect any kind of longevity.
I had measured from the center of the hub to the bottom of the fender. Stock was 18 1/2 inches and with the 884's it was a little over 24 inches. I only wanted 2-2 1/2 inches of lift. I ended up pulling the 884's off and setting the front 5100's to the 3rd setting from the bottom and putting the stock springs back on. This gave me exactly 2 1/2 inches. Perfect.
Maybe the 884's are just too stiff. I don't know but they did not work out for me.
New OME 884 front springs for sale $150, includes shipping. LOL !
04 SR5 V6 4X4
I also had a similar experience with the OME 884's. I'm sorry I did not see Byways post earlier.
I used 5100's front and rear with the OME 884's on the stock (lowest) setting in the front and Toytech Super Flex springs in the rear. Putting the stock springs next to the 884's, the 884's were about 2 inches taller but after installing them I had a little over 5 inches of lift in the front. As Byways has noted the CV axle angle is very steep. Too steep to expect any kind of longevity.
I had measured from the center of the hub to the bottom of the fender. Stock was 18 1/2 inches and with the 884's it was a little over 24 inches. I only wanted 2-2 1/2 inches of lift. I ended up pulling the 884's off and setting the front 5100's to the 3rd setting from the bottom and putting the stock springs back on. This gave me exactly 2 1/2 inches. Perfect.
Maybe the 884's are just too stiff. I don't know but they did not work out for me.
New OME 884 front springs for sale $150, includes shipping. LOL !
04 SR5 V6 4X4