This conversation is getting a bit vague but yes I believe there are some social injustices. However, I DO NOT THINK JOINING A F$#K THE POLICE MOVEMENT IS THE RIGHT ANSWER. In fact it is explosively divisive.
I don't deny that there exists a state of social injustice in some communities in the United States. Personally I believe money is far more of a factor than race. Money is everything but everyone (including liberals) don't want to talk about it. Instead they prefer to talk about race/ethnicity. Anything but class, anything at all.
Woah, to call it a "**** the police" movement is obviously not true. You never addressed my earlier question of where you are getting this information from? While I don't agree that BLM is a **** the police movement, I would certainly agree that a **** the police attitude is not beneficial.
Odd that you say that liberals don't want to talk about class. Wasn't income inequality a huge issue for liberals (and everyone) this election season? I would agree that it is definitely a contributing factor. Why are incomes lower among black people? Is it possibly due to differences in access to education, fewer employment options due to higher incarceration rates? Black history resulting in less inherited wealth and land ownership? hiring bias, etc? What some might call 'systemic' issues.
Maybe it is because I live in San Diego which is very diverse I have a different perspective. Here there are many minorities that have lots of money. Just drive to the mall or the beach and you will see Benz, Lexus, even Bentley's with non white owners - not a few, but lots.
This is obviously anecdotal. No one is claiming there are NO rich black people. But you cant just look at a few anecdotal instances local to you and ignore the stats of what is going on nationally.
The media, especially social media are inflaming people and distorting the facts. It even effected you right? You clearly implied that the LA or MN police officer shooting was murder but the MN shooting occurred off camera and the LA shooting was also vague and his hands weren't visible in the cell video. So you don't know that it was murder at all. Yet you, like the president and many others (I'm guessing with more carelessness than malice) decided based solely on an online narrative that cops are murdering people and that the LA/MN shooting was murder (vs a justified shooting). This is exactly the problem.
First of all, my statement about police murders was based off of the plethora of examples from the last decade, not jus these specific instances. That aside, I, like many others, concluded such not based off of some online narrative but based off of the video itself, our own knowledge and experience dealing with police, basic human behaviour, behavioural clues from watching the people in the video, tone of voice, reading their reactions, the reactions of the crowds surrounding the incident, etc.
You're right that we don't have all the facts, but we never will. We weren't there and the only unbiased source we have to base our decision on IS the video (thanks to the convenient 'dislodging' of the police's body cameras). Its not uncommon in these fast paced, high stress situations for people to remember things, even basic details, incorrectly. Both civilians and police.