BALL JOINTS: Sankei 555 (Moog/Raybestos) Poor Quality/Design Flaw??? My Findings...
- Thread starter nobb
- Start date
Japan Raybestos no issues
I have over 340K on my 2005 Tundra with factory off road kit and its time for ball joints again.
Its had them changed out twice, once for the recall just under 60k and again around 210k with the Japanese made Raybestos (bearing & casting say Three Five) on them fwiw.
For the difference in cash vs OEM I'm replacing them again with the same Raybestos parts, going over 100k miles is acceptable to me with a little larger than stock Duratracs.
But' fwiw, I'll simply parrot an old friends advice who owns a suspension/driveline shop for several decades who's seen it all. He says most cases of premature suspension failures is due to "half ass lift setups and oversize tires" adding more stress.
People going cheap on lift kits without upgrading the control arms results in direct premature ball joint failure due to the caster alignment. Just because a truck aligns on the rack does not mean it will be without problems down the road. Not blaming just saying it adds to it...
The top UCA on these Toys should be changed if lifting just a few inches especially if hard wheeling is in the future, so anyone who has ball joint failures a lot might check into it.
Lots of choices for Toys. Peace!!
https://www.tundras.com/threads/everything-you-need-to-know-about-upper-control-arms-uca.4497/
I have over 340K on my 2005 Tundra with factory off road kit and its time for ball joints again.
Its had them changed out twice, once for the recall just under 60k and again around 210k with the Japanese made Raybestos (bearing & casting say Three Five) on them fwiw.
For the difference in cash vs OEM I'm replacing them again with the same Raybestos parts, going over 100k miles is acceptable to me with a little larger than stock Duratracs.
But' fwiw, I'll simply parrot an old friends advice who owns a suspension/driveline shop for several decades who's seen it all. He says most cases of premature suspension failures is due to "half ass lift setups and oversize tires" adding more stress.
People going cheap on lift kits without upgrading the control arms results in direct premature ball joint failure due to the caster alignment. Just because a truck aligns on the rack does not mean it will be without problems down the road. Not blaming just saying it adds to it...
The top UCA on these Toys should be changed if lifting just a few inches especially if hard wheeling is in the future, so anyone who has ball joint failures a lot might check into it.
Lots of choices for Toys. Peace!!
https://www.tundras.com/threads/everything-you-need-to-know-about-upper-control-arms-uca.4497/
Last edited:
absalom
New member
Why would lack of UBJ adjustability have any bearing on LBJ life?
As an update since my posting. It's been 5 years/70,000 kms since I replaced my LBJ's with the OEM ones and I have already noticed minor play so I had to replace them again. I still kept my factory original joints with 300,000kms as comparison and strangely, the 70,000km ones felt noticeably looser than the 300,000km ones. 5 yrs ago was also when I out a 3" Old Man Emu lift so I'm wondering if that is the primary cause for the accelerated wear.
Moog bashing
One of my trucks is a 1 ton Dodge Ram 4x4 and when I rebuilt the front suspension, the LBJ and UBJ were MOOG. They had the best quality on the market unless you wanted to spend 400 on one articular brand that will go unnamed.
I investigated the LBJ thoroughly due to the 18,000 lb GVW with all my toys and boat in tow.
MOOG was the best choice for that build, I'm surprised to see it being bashed so hard on this forum. That said, I am about to replace upper and lower on my 2001 4R so I'm glad I stumbled across this thread. I'm doing the CV boots also and will probable go with Beck Arnley-any comments on that?
One of my trucks is a 1 ton Dodge Ram 4x4 and when I rebuilt the front suspension, the LBJ and UBJ were MOOG. They had the best quality on the market unless you wanted to spend 400 on one articular brand that will go unnamed.
I investigated the LBJ thoroughly due to the 18,000 lb GVW with all my toys and boat in tow.
MOOG was the best choice for that build, I'm surprised to see it being bashed so hard on this forum. That said, I am about to replace upper and lower on my 2001 4R so I'm glad I stumbled across this thread. I'm doing the CV boots also and will probable go with Beck Arnley-any comments on that?
Scramble
New member
For american cars & trucks moog & cardone seem to be upgrades. Not for Japanese cars & trucks. I've only heard good things about the BA boots.
96RedRunner
Senior Member
I agree with what your saying here, though I have evidence that proves other wise.
Not being Smartass saying that, ight.
Useage and setup can make a lot of difference, emphasis on setup.
I'm sure you know this, all BJ's have a operating range, stock height no problems.
I ran 96red 2" daystar lift to 246k mi DD 265/75's, got a real lift SS1.2 3" F 4" R, 285/75 STT's
This is where setup becomes crucial (operating range) of BJ's.
When I installed SS1.2 limit straps went also and I set them to the range of BJ's not strut travel.
Sure I lost usable travel of strut, mechanical limits are what they are.
I think if folks would utilize limit straps when lifting it would help.
96red got BJ's @ 349k mi @ FSM spec limit.
My $.02
Last edited:
The OEM Toyota reboot kit is expensive but will last the longest. The reason why most aftermarket boot kits and even CV joints suck is because they use neoprene/silicone. Almost ALL OEM's for the last 20 years have switched to thermoplastic for the CV boots, which is a far superior material and can be expected to last 20 years in normal applications.
On average I've had to redo my CV boots every 2 years. BOTH sides have been failing together like clockwork within months of each other. I have lifetime warranty on these boots but it's annoying to keep having to redo them.
Agreed, just Like Mahle, Meyle, and some other euro aftermarket brands are great replacements for European Cars.
I've had Audi's and VW's in the past and the aftermarket like control arm kits, OTR's etc are either OEM Suppliers or on par with OEM at the fraction of the cost.
The FJ ball joint design is much different from 3rd gen runner. If the ball joint fails on a FJ, nothing will happen and you still can drive until someone detects that the ball joint is shot. For the 3rd gen case is very different and dangerous.
OEM TOYOTA ball joint is the ONLY way to go with 3rd gen 4runner and Hilux Surf.
1st picture is FJ
2nd picture is 4runner
OEM TOYOTA ball joint is the ONLY way to go with 3rd gen 4runner and Hilux Surf.
1st picture is FJ
2nd picture is 4runner
Attachments
Last edited:
T4R2014
Elite Member
Anyone with experience with these though? I've heard great things about this brand, just not for this specific application. The million mile warranty is all marketing BS. A sealed ball joint is a wearing part. Highly doubt they will make money on that, plus the money you save with the warranty exchange is down the drain when you consider downtime and labor. With the amount of lifted failures happening, I wouldn't be surprised if these companies began voiding warranties if a failure happened on a lifted vehicle. Plus, what's the point of a free set of ball joints if the vehicle gets totaled?
I'd love to see how they stack up considering all I've heard about the brand, but I'm still mucho skeptical.
4x4run4x4fun
New member
OEM in the bracket just bolt on is the best way to go for 3rd gen. I just experienced a wild ride. My 4runner popped the lower ball joint with out warning. No warble, no drift, nothing. Stretched the upper ball joint but did not break. I have spoke to other owners that went with after market. They have not lasted 200k miles only lasted around 50k I decided OEM since the was the first ball joint replacement
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
96RedRunner
Senior Member
Last edited:
Drcoffee
Senior Member
All good questions. I searched the web hard for any negative stories on Proforged LBJs and did not find one bad story, expeience or even warranty replacement. You Cant say the same about all the others. Bad news travels far and wide. They are built in USA in NJ.
96RedRunner
Senior Member
Any of the BJ's will work any can fail. If I'm not willing to run them on my rig I won't suggest them to someone else. I installed Toyota's on the 01 I bought 2-17
11k mi on them now, won't be long I'll be doing the FSM check when I rotate the tires.
11k mi on them now, won't be long I'll be doing the FSM check when I rotate the tires.
There's so many variables that unless we can get data from a big sample size it's still hard to find a conclusion. The original OEM LBJs lasted 320,000kms and were still very tight. Then I lifted it 3" and installed new OEM LBJs, but this time they became VERY loose after only 70,000kms.
4x4run4x4fun
New member
I wonder how the lifting factors in on the ball joint life if they wear out quicker quicker or is it the fact we drive on tougher surfaces wearing them out sooner. My T4R is a 98 on 99 tall springs well with in OEM standards. Not lifted for a T4R but a little higher then stock. I wish my would have lasted to 300k but fate did not work that way..
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
