The other option would be to hear nothing until the second it’s announced. Nobody likes to be teased but at least we now know that we’re getting some.
The psychology of getting a bunch of grown ass adults all giddy about a new car is fascinating.
The other option would be to hear nothing until the second it’s announced. Nobody likes to be teased but at least we now know that we’re getting some.
Most unibody SUVs do, IMO. The only ones that I like the styling on are the Mercedes GLE AMG and the LR Disco, Defender, and RR. The X5 is ok, not great IMO. And I still have a soft spot for VW Touaregs but the new ones just look like an upscale Atlas Sport. None of the Asian or US unibodies look good to me.
IMO the Jeep Recon is a great looking boxy unibody. As is the new Defender. The Disco 4 was pretty decent as well. The new one - meh. Same for the BMW and Merc models for me. I think the Kia Telluride did the styling better than any of the luxury brands in that category, including the Genesis version. The other models I find pretty good looking are the Volvo lineup. I think they've done a great job across the board.
The psychology of getting a bunch of grown ass adults all giddy about a new car is fascinating.
Fascinating observation in a 6th Gen Speculation thread :wave:
The other models I find pretty good looking are the Volvo lineup. I think they've done a great job across the board.
Actually I do like the Volvos and would consider a 90 if they weren't owned by China.
Kirk has a video on the new battery technologies from today's announcement, first 10 min of this video.This is what the hybrid models need - better batteries and more capacity. A PHEV version with a 20kwh battery matched with the T24A would be absolutely killer. If they did that - easy choice to buy over a TTv6 for me.
IMO the Jeep Recon is a great looking boxy unibody. As is the new Defender. The Disco 4 was pretty decent as well. The new one - meh. Same for the BMW and Merc models for me. I think the Kia Telluride did the styling better than any of the luxury brands in that category, including the Genesis version. The other models I find pretty good looking are the Volvo lineup. I think they've done a great job across the board.
A long lost photo of [MENTION=714734]gomiami[/MENTION]I test drove the XC90 and gave it serious consideration. The interior was fantastic, one of the best I've been in regardless of price, but the moonroof design was terrible, it had almost 0 off-road ability and the cargo space was very limited. Also, the taillights are beyond ugly.
Every time I see someone write Disco 4 I think of the 70s.
A long lost photo of [MENTION=714734]gomiami[/MENTION]
![]()
TLDNR - 2024 GX Dimensions
CORRECT - Length - 194.88"
CORRECT - Width - 77.95"
I got similar body dimensions as you back on June 13th in post #1070.
Curious. How do you know that the photo with the mirrors inboard of the body show them in the normal driving position? Autoweek reported that ""The new GX is 83.22 inches wide with the mirrors out...". Others have reported similar. Some of the available YouTube videos showing the vehicles moving seem to show the extent of the mirrors are outboard of the body but it's really hard to tell for sure. It seems possible the mirrors were tucked in for photo purposes and could either swing out further or slide out as do some trailer towing mirrors. There has to be a reason Lexus used the 83.22" width in all of their documentation.
DC
I wonder if the mirrors are power folding.
[MENTION=750013]I've deleted my posts I referenced earlier, could you please edit your reply above to delete my incorrect "corrections".
So does this sound correct to you?
Overall Width of widest part of body, not including mirrors - 77.95"
Overall Width with mirrors extended in there normal driving position - 83.22"
A couple years ago we bought a new CUV for my wife to drive. The trim level came with 20" wheels, but I asked the dealer to swap them (for no credit) for the 18" of the base model. They'd not had the request before, but were willing to do it. Just ask the dealer... they likely get you-charge a "lucky" base model buyer who wrongly perceives the 20's to be an upgrade.As I ponder my next vehicle, I'm leaning towards the new GX, 4Runner or LC. The new Tacoma is also an option. Every time I consider a Toyota vehicle, I get frustrated by the compromises required to own one. I've always been a fan of real leather but it's looking like my best option for a GX is the Premium+ model and it only comes with Nuluxe.
Any had both Nuluxe and Semi Aniline leather and can describe the differences between the two? I've heard the Nuluxe is very durable but how does it feel on bare skin? It can be hot out here in West Texas and I'd rather not stick to the seats like happened in the vinyl seats of yesteryear.
I could step up to the Luxury trim to get leather seats but I really hate 22" wheels on these vehicles. I actually want the 18" wheels and rubber that comes on the Overtrail but Lexus won't let me have it on the Premium or Luxury models. The Overtrail has a deal killer for me - I do not like the olive trim on the seats. Even if that trim was my favorite color, I wouldn't want it. I prefer more of a solid color seat or at least trim that is in the same color family as the base seat. Absent this seat trim choice, I could get behind an Overtrail if the Nuluxe is a good option.
Question for Toyota/Lexus: Why do you never allow your customers to choose the most luxurious interior and pair it with the most off-road worthy suspension and drive train?
Appreciate any thoughts.
DC