hmmmm, wondering what V8 you drove. The V6 is faster? Not a chance!
2005 V6 specs: 245 hp @ 5200 rpm / 282 ft-lbs torque @ 3800 rpm
2005 V8 specs: 270 hp @ 5400 rpm / 320 ft-lbs torque @ 3400 rpm
I'm not hating on the V6, I actually really like that engine but the V8 is not slower!!![]()
I drove both and decided the v8 limited was best
Hopefully, someday soon, the decision makers at Toyota will realize that those of us with V8s will be leaving the Toyota brand when we have to replace our 4Runners if the current generation does not fill our needs. (for towing power and towing capacity).
Also, what is up with the 4.6L V8 only being available in the Tundra with some funky option combinations?
I had a tacoma,2005, and always dreamed of putting a 4.7 in it. When I looked at 4runners, I told my wife I would be getting a V8. No question. I drove the 4.7 and it was slower and lugged down to pull where the V6 had more pep. I sat and question my man-hood... How could I ever want the smaller, less powerful engine? I got a V6 because I don't have thing to tow and like to drive fast.
Honestly a 3UR-FE (5.7L) would be an awesome addition to the 4Runner if not overkill, a 1UR-FE (4.6L) Would be perfect for the new 4Runners. My only complaint with these two engines is that unlike the 2UZ-FE (4.7L) they were designed with Cast Aluminum engine blocks, which makes me wary in a vehicle like a truck or SUV. But that is my opinion.
And I love my '04 SE V8 4WD
So, For those of you that have driven and possibly owned both the non VVT-i and the motor with it, what do you think the major difference is?