Ummmmm.....Go back and read your first post in this thread you yourself named "Help With The 285 vs 265 Question"
There is only
one question in that first post
"Then there's the question of what, if any, rubbing comes up by going bigger? For those of you who went from the OEM's, or another 265/70/265, up to 285's....I'd sure appreciate your experiences and opinions.
The rest of it is all statements you concluded!
What is your other question in it besides 285's rubbing like 50 other threads?
harper please go back and read my very next post after realizing the original post had inadvertently sent at least one person in the wrong direction. BTY it was posted only 30 minutes later.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducmonsta View Post
Where's your question?
Is your question about rub with a 285?
******
Yes I do wonder about rubbing, and wondered if that's a difficult or expensive item to fix? However
let me be more specific on the real question (sorry I wasn't clear.)
Disregarding which size tire may or may not look better:
1.
Do forum members think the extra 1/2 to 3/4 inch tread width will make a noticeable difference for the use intended. That is extra float on sand or mud? If so how much...10%....20%?
2.
What, if any, was the MPG loss when up-sizing from 265 to 285 size?
3. Considering the additional cost of a spare, up-charge, and potential future loss of MPG,
what is the opinion of forum members on whether the upgrade in tread width a questionable item....or worth it?
Thanks in advance for any help...this forum is an invaluable resource, and I feel privileged to be part of it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the time limamike chimed in, almost a full day had gone by and another 16 posts had been added. More to the point on each occasion when the subject matter strayed (mud on the side windows, deflators and compressors, rubbing and clearance, 285 spare fit) I tried to steer it back on point.
Such as:-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canazes9 View Post
I find it difficult to take the request for off road tire information seriously from someone that won't air down their tires off road. You are debating a 10% diff in contact patch when 100% larger contact patch is available for ~ $150.
Buy a compressor and some deflators..
A mild LT AT tire would be perfect for your use. Mickey Thompson STZ 275/70R17 would seem like an excellent choice to me. They will fit with no rubbing:
Mickey Thompson Performance Tires & Wheels
*******
David I'm afraid you've misunderstood and that's my fault.
Let me explain that we're talking about destination off roading to surf spots in the bush, for lack of better term. I actually do carry a compressor, and this isn't a case of refusing to air down. The peculiarities of the region make driving with speed on the sand virtually mandatory.
and-------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanpat57 View Post
Being a Revo II guy myself (LT's) I doubt there will be any difference at all between the 265/285.....IIRC there was a 6 lb' difference between them....but rolling resistance would be negligible.
I'm switching over to 285's this spring.
*******
pat - I'm not doubting you at all, but
could you be more specific as to your thinking the rolling resistance would be negligibly different with the width / weight differential?
Thanks,
and------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrandom View Post
Well you have two opposing uses.
Sand you want flotation with very little penetration. The taller and wider the lugs the deeper the penetration and disturbance you create in the surface of the sand the easier to sink. The idea with sand is too make it think you are not there That said besides a paddle, worn down wide at or mt tires work best in sand.
Mud on the other hand is the opposite, wider spacing, taller lugs allow for easier cleaning, so material does not build up giving you more traction, or at the least better swimming through. The basic idea for most mud is to cut through it and get down to firm ground so a taller narrow tire with large deep lugs is usually best. Think swamp buggies
*******
Thank you j.
That was a very well written synopsis of the dilemma for anyone with a focus on sand and mud. We're at cross purposes, and it's a delicate balancing act to reach the perfect compromise.
A couple people (including LandCruiser & Intruder) have made it clear the 285 size presents at least some fit challenges. Canazes made a very interesting suggestion for 275's that provide a wider tread and will fit. However as many people know there's next to nothing available in that size.
The Mickey Thompson STZ Canazes linked look fantastic. They get excellent reviews, and spec out with a very impressive 8.85" tread width (and 32.18" diameter). Then again they should look great at $228. a copy. With the spare and size up-charge we're talking a good $500. more than installing four P265's like a Nitto or Toyo.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I can't imagine how any of the above constitutes a thread intended to be on "the 285 rubbing question." I also don't see where cherry picking a couple of original sentences which are clearly stated as misunderstood and redirected away from immediately thereafter, makes for a very good argument.
Lastly my question was about a tire need for very specific condition which you'd be very hard pressed to find in a search, if it existed here at all. Moreover I apologized for the original misunderstanding, and consistently moved to keep things going back to the specified question. Which was NOT about rubbing, it was about the relative value and cost of increasing tire size vs. the effective amount of tread over a specific type of mud & sand.
The success and importance of sites like this are because people seek and share information. No one is forced to participate, and there are several subjects that get talked about constantly. Like sliders which I have no interest in and find very redundant too. Moreover a huge percentage of people on this site don't buy sliders. However EVERY person here will eventually buy tires.
It's all about what your interested in, and since I have no interest in sliders I simply don't read those threads. I'll try not to follow limamike's example and claim slider threads "clutter up the forum" and call for the mods.