Inv4drZm
Senior Member
I assumed the FJ rear driveshaft was the same as ours.
Wrong.
Its .28" larger in diameter and .5" shorter. Since I have .5" less slip yoke showing our overall flange-flange lengths are the same right now. The FJ driveshaft might be a decent upgrade for those installing the ECGS D60 and not wanting to extend their links further back.
I don't see why ECGS seems to think we need shorter driveshafts. He's got 1.75" of compression room on the slip yoke I had 2" before the D60. I now have 1.5" with the D60. Not to mention you can't shorten ours because of the swedged tube.
I did some more digging and the Tacoma guys running Tacobox T-cases can shorten their driveshafts because the design is different, their tubes aren't swedged.
FJ on top, 4runner on bottom:


Wrong.
Its .28" larger in diameter and .5" shorter. Since I have .5" less slip yoke showing our overall flange-flange lengths are the same right now. The FJ driveshaft might be a decent upgrade for those installing the ECGS D60 and not wanting to extend their links further back.
I don't see why ECGS seems to think we need shorter driveshafts. He's got 1.75" of compression room on the slip yoke I had 2" before the D60. I now have 1.5" with the D60. Not to mention you can't shorten ours because of the swedged tube.
I did some more digging and the Tacoma guys running Tacobox T-cases can shorten their driveshafts because the design is different, their tubes aren't swedged.
FJ on top, 4runner on bottom:


Last edited:


























