E
Even Steven
Guest
simple said:I think what Rook is getting is the bickering by both sides is really, really annoying. Your thread may not have stared a coup, but it sure as hell feels like the forum has divided picking sides.
The arguments keep spreading to other threads it seems. The incessant need to defend oneself over a trite remark the other has said is lame. Debating is great, but please understand, 'you're stupid' is not a valid rebuttal.
Well, at the risk of sounding like an ass, I've gotta say that you are free to read whatever you want on this forum. If you perceive these types of threads as bickering, then don't read them. Others are obviously interested in reading them. Just look at the amount of views on that thread.
You're right though... I don't want to see arguments spreading to the other threads. It's a better idea to limit them to one or two threads. I see no point in ruining other people's threads by carrying over crap into them, althought I'm sure I've been guilty of that in the past. Keep in mind that any arguments spilling into the other threads is mostly because there was something fundamentally wrong in the forum and other people decided to lash out.
A good example, and trust me there are plenty from both sides so don't feel called out, but ES, instead of saying, 'roger that' to Rooks post you felt the need to continue with the remarks. We know you feel like you've been wronged, and you've made it clear in your 'thai is a punk thread'. But sometimes situations just call for accepting a little blame and moving on.
Maybe it's just my personality, but when I read rook's post, I honestly felt the desire to defend my position on SOME of the things he said. Notice that I gave him credit for a good post (first thing I said), but then had to provide a little bit of detail to explain my actions in the past. Sure, I could have let it go, but if I did that, I wouldn't be me.