Talk me into an LT coil over.

I still wouldn't want to run the Rubi in a 4Runner just due to clearance and wheel base issues, regardless of suspension. And call me when a SAS'd 4Runner does the Rubicon. SAS isn't some magic bullet either, and suffers from bad handling at speed. Look at the rigs winning the Score 500/1000, NORRA, and King of the Hammers, and they're almost entirely IFS.

And more importantly, all the key winners are running Kings and Fox shocks.

I don't want to put down ICON, because it's certainly very high end of the lower/middle quality range, but it's a company that spends more on marketing than product development. If I was doing LT, and hey wait...I did, I wouldn't want to make some irrevocable modifications to my vehicle and then say "you know what, I'm gonna go cheap on shocks!"

There, I said it. No takes-y-backsies!

The 4Runner, especially the 5th gen, would just get eaten alive as a high speed desert runner unless you gut it to the point it really isn't a 4Runner any more. Which if that gets you hard, uh...sure, do it.

As you stated the most critical upgrades are increased down travel, which equates to better stability when in situations where a normal travel suspension system would equal the vehicle on 3 or 2 wheels. The wider stance also helps in tippier terrain by the nature of 4" additional inches of wheel base. Fun fact: the 2017 Raptor has a width of 86.7", my 4Runner is about 84, so wide bottom girls make the world go round!

The key thing is reliability and driveability. And I'll be honest, I think my LT vehicle on road trips...sucks. If you like the fact that you can set your vehicle straight, keep two fingers on the wheel, and let it cruise...kiss that good bye. Even with a really, really really really, good alignment the vehicle will want to wallow, which makes 10 hours of driving a very exhausting experience. Add in cross winds and oh man...fun times.

The other big factor is reliability, and this goes to anyone curious in general about LT, you will have to do the majority of maintenance yourself. That means lubing uniballs, greasing zerk fittings, checking torque values, and keeping a spare extended axel on hand because you're not gonna find one of those at a dealer or parts store.

The point is, and I'm just sharing my .02 cents, is that as you said there's a very big trade off in exchange for the gains. It's also a very expensive upgrade. Anyone who does it right, including upgrading the other affected systems, tunes it, etc, the cost is a lot. And given the cost I can't fathom going with ICON.

Need is a strong word... I would say "highly desirable" in two main scenarios that are not all that common for a 5th gen...

1.If you ever wanted to run some trail like the rubicon and wanted to have hopes of keeping up with solid axle rigs and taking similar lines. The increased wheel travel opens up many possibilities for what a rig can do and maintain stability and traction. It's still not as good as SAS when it comes to extreme trails..., but it is a move in the right direction.

2. If you ever wanted to do any high speed desert type stuff. You need the travel and improved motion ratios to take the abuse. The shocks angle out more and are longer overall allowing for lighter springs and better dampening....

For number #1 the increased droop/articulation and wider stance is mainly what you are after, for number # 2 its the increased up travel and piston travel in the shock that allows big hits to be soaked up.


More suspension travel is simply addictive when you get into extreme terrain. It turns a big obstacle into FUN! :beer:

There are some big downsides that come with it... It's clearly not for everyone.

The 5th gen platform itself is pretty limited by the body and clearance (gas tank...) when it comes to extreme offroad use. So I feel it is kind of a dumb move overall. But... I like doing stupid things sometimes. I don't need to drive the truck daily or anything.. It's more of a toy, so toys need to be played with and its fun to learn and try different things.
 
Last edited:
Agree with the LD.

While I have over built all my previous rigs to the point of selling them, because...I honestly ruined them, I would not do this to a DD. Now I know this doesn't apply to the OP and it's a toy, learn from other that dropped 10k into a setup like this. It's not just a small trade off...it's huge!

My last four rigs ended up on on 37-39" tires and mods to handle those tires. All were sold as three were DD's. Not fun at all.

I promised myself I wouldn't go that far with this one and I'm not. I've gone farther than I planned already and I'm mild compared to most. :biggrin1:

I'm learning (sorta).
 
Agree with the LD.

While I have over built all my previous rigs to the point of selling them, because...I honestly ruined them, I would not do this to a DD. Now I know this doesn't apply to the OP and it's a toy, learn from other that dropped 10k into a setup like this. It's not just a small trade off...it's huge!

My last four rigs ended up on on 37-39" tires and mods to handle those tires. All were sold as three were DD's. Not fun at all.

I promised myself I wouldn't go that far with this one and I'm not. I've gone farther than I planned already and I'm mild compared to most. :biggrin1:

I'm learning (sorta).

Mine is STILL a daily driver. Is it a cool daily driver? Oh hulls yuhhhh... But it's also kind of a soup sandwich for long distance road trips. And I'm not exactly looking forward to the 14+ hour drive to LA in 3 weeks to Goose Gear, nor the 7 hours to Overland Expo.

I mean it's cool knowing my truck could literally EAT the 4Runners from Overland Expo. Just saying.

I don't feel I've ruined my truck. Walt and I worked very hard to keep it in a gray area that works well for DD and overlanding, but there's a lot I miss about stock/semi-stock in terms of reliability and just road handling.
 
More suspension travel is simply addictive when you get into extreme terrain. It turns a big obstacle into FUN! :beer:

There are some big downsides that come with it... It's clearly not for everyone.

The 5th gen platform itself is pretty limited by the body and clearance (gas tank...) when it comes to extreme offroad use. So I feel it is kind of a dumb move overall. But... I like doing stupid things sometimes. I don't need to drive the truck daily or anything.. It's more of a toy, so toys need to be played with and its fun to learn and try different things.

yup, toy, not daily driven. This type of hobby/addiction :help: is not for someone who needs to use the same vehicle every day on the street for work/groceries/blah blah blah. i'm replacing heims/uniballs yearly on my titan, it gets old but its nice to have the know how and the capability/past tense capability lol. and thats just for a mid travel truck lol. i can't imagine the wear and tear on a daily driven long travel truck:deadhorse:


you should just do a +3 kit up front and a true 4link in the back. use the rear for coilovers and cage.:tea:
 
Mine is STILL a daily driver. Is it a cool daily driver? Oh hulls yuhhhh... But it's also kind of a soup sandwich for long distance road trips. And I'm not exactly looking forward to the 14+ hour drive to LA in 3 weeks to Goose Gear, nor the 7 hours to Overland Expo.

I mean it's cool knowing my truck could literally EAT the 4Runners from Overland Expo. Just saying.

I don't feel I've ruined my truck. Walt and I worked very hard to keep it in a gray area that works well for DD and overlanding, but there's a lot I miss about stock/semi-stock in terms of reliability and just road handling.


No I agree whole heartedly that it's not ruined for your purposes. I did however when it came time for those trips and the pavement wore me out to the point I bought a trailer, tow rig....and got laughed at for not driving it. Yeah.

It's cool as hell and each time I do a mod..my wife grounds me. Do we "need" that? I ruined her favorite rigs, 80 series cruisers. I should have kept those mild too. She loved the look, hated the 10-11mpg and putting babies in a tall rig sucks.

I show her your Runner all the time, it's awesome. But she hates the thought of that....being her DD. I get it, 55 miles a day in something that doesn't want to do 70 on I5 sucks.
 
Agree with the LD.

While I have over built all my previous rigs to the point of selling them, because...I honestly ruined them, I would not do this to a DD. Now I know this doesn't apply to the OP and it's a toy, learn from other that dropped 10k into a setup like this. It's not just a small trade off...it's huge!

My last four rigs ended up on on 37-39" tires and mods to handle those tires. All were sold as three were DD's. Not fun at all.

I promised myself I wouldn't go that far with this one and I'm not. I've gone farther than I planned already and I'm mild compared to most. :biggrin1:

I'm learning (sorta).

I learned 25 years ago. Nothing wrong with it and enjoy modding to the next level, which is what LT is. But, as the guys say, it's starting to walk the fine line between a nice, reliable DD or now just a weekend toy.
My 4Runner is a tool. It is my daily driver, it's a pickup truck, a light duty tow vehicle, a bike hauler and most important, it gets me to hard to reach job sites. You see old logging roads? I sometimes am on them while they are building them lol. I also drive it around 30K a year.

LT is a step to the next level. Not a lot of people go there. Make sure you take pictures!
 
And I'll be honest, I think my LT vehicle on road trips...sucks. If you like the fact that you can set your vehicle straight, keep two fingers on the wheel, and let it cruise...kiss that good bye. Even with a really, really really really, good alignment the vehicle will want to wallow, which makes 10 hours of driving a very exhausting experience. Add in cross winds and oh man...fun times.

The point is, and I'm just sharing my .02 cents, is that as you said there's a very big trade off in exchange for the gains. It's also a very expensive upgrade. Anyone who does it right, including upgrading the other affected systems, tunes it, etc, the cost is a lot. And given the cost I can't fathom going with ICON.

I can't help but think some of your statements conflict a bit. Not trying to bust your balls.. and appreciate the input, but I don't see a reason why an LT truck cannot drive good in a straight line with the proper suspension tuning. It should even be decent in the corners and no worse than std travel without a front sway. I know a few people on ICONs with 700lb springs up front and full bumpers... no sway and no complaints really. The claim is near perfect road manners with the beset ride in the world....

I'm not an ICON fanboy or anything, but that is the compromise ICON makes with their design. Wallow is a known characteristic of a progressively valved shock and is exactly what digressive valving attempts to eliminate.

None of us are experts here (and I'm not sure if any really exists for this use case)...and the various combos have simply not been done enough to know the perfect combo. I'm trying to keep an open mind vs jumping into brand loyalty thing.
 
The wallowing is not a characteristic of the shock in this situation, i know people with other LT setups using non King shocks who describe their rigs as "driving like a boat." You're taking the vehicle beyond what it was spec'd to do.

It wants to go in a straight line, but it tends to want to catch the road, the grain, and the imperfections, and go left or right whereas a stock suspension would have been more forgiving in how it handles the crown of the road (almost always what we consider flat is not in fact).

If ICON makes a quality long travel setup up front for the 4Runner I've yet to see it, just like I've yet to see them being used in the top winners at national and international events.

I'd rather pay an extra 500-1000 and have the best. Also very few people complain about their setups because of the sunk fallacy concept. People love what they bought and rarely criticize or act honestly about it.

I can't help but think some of your statements conflict a bit. Not trying to bust your balls.. and appreciate the input, but I don't see a reason why an LT truck cannot drive good in a straight line with the proper suspension tuning. It should even be decent in the corners and no worse than std travel without a front sway. I know a few people on ICONs with 700lb springs up front and full bumpers... no sway and no complaints really. The claim is near perfect road manners with the beset ride in the world....

I'm not an ICON fanboy or anything, but that is the compromise ICON makes with their design. Wallow is a known characteristic of a progressively valved shock and is exactly what digressive valving attempts to eliminate.

None of us are experts here (and I'm not sure if any really exists for this use case)...and the various combos have simply not been done enough to know the perfect combo. I'm trying to keep an open mind vs jumping into brand loyalty thing.
 
Excuse the off topic question. But why is there no front sway bar solution for lt?

Like retro fit a wider bar from a bigger truck or a antirock with custom end arms.

Also excuse my ignorance if necessary
 
Excuse the off topic question. But why is there no front sway bar solution for lt?

Like retro fit a wider bar from a bigger truck or a antirock with custom end arms.

Also excuse my ignorance if necessary

Because a sway bar will limit articulation. The whole point of long travel is to achieve as much articulation as possible.

I get a decent amount of body roll up front, but very little in the rear, which was critical because I'll be towing my trailer around for camping and having driven an FJC without ANY sway bars on a 3.5+ kit, oh god that is not fun.
 
Because a sway bar will limit articulation. The whole point of long travel is to achieve as much articulation as possible.

I get a decent amount of body roll up front, but very little in the rear, which was critical because I'll be towing my trailer around for camping and having driven an FJC without ANY sway bars on a 3.5+ kit, oh god that is not fun.
I understand the purpose for long travel. That's what they make quick disconnects for. But for a to b trips that are on the road a sway bar would be great.
 
I understand the purpose for long travel. That's what they make quick disconnects for. But for a to b trips that are on the road a sway bar would be great.

Because quick disconnects suck. Complex solutions fail in complex ways.
 
I understand the purpose for long travel. That's what they make quick disconnects for. But for a to b trips that are on the road a sway bar would be great.

Yes, front swaybar would be fantastic.... Just can't really make one and nobody has done it. The front of the truck makes building one or using something like an anti-rock extremely difficult. All kinds of stuff in the way. The stock swaybars are very complex to replicate.
 
Because quick disconnects suck. Complex solutions fail in complex ways.
That news to me. But if there not your thing, a standard link and a wrench achieve the same thing.
Yes, front swaybar would be fantastic.... Just can't really make one and nobody has done it. The front of the truck makes building one or using something like an anti-rock extremely difficult. All kinds of stuff in the way. The stock swaybars are very complex to replicate.
I'm just suprised no one has come up with something. It's not like lt is new. I was just wondering is someone has tried or thought of it. I came up with that thought just a bit ago when a tundra drove by. I thought I wonder if that sway bar is wider.
 
Usually when you have a full long travel vehicle you don't really think about how it will drive on the street. I can't give much insight to people that own 4runners since it is very new to me, but I have had 3 long travel trucks and only really cared how it performed off-road. I also DD all of the that I have owned. I just drive safely and also know how my vehicle will handle.

I will agree driving it long distance sucks. Use to drive mine 12 hours for 800 miles all the time. However, I just drove as safe as possible.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I will agree driving it long distance sucks. Use to drive mine 12 hours for 800 miles all the time. However, I just drove as safe as possible.

Exactly. It doesn't drive unsafely, it just reduces the margin between easy driver and very hands on.
 
That's what I meant. It's not sketchy in a way it's gonna lose control. Just isn't something that you can just zone out and drive.

Obviously this is a 4Runner Forum, but long travel is long travel. I use to own a Ford Ranger that had a Camburg LT kit and linked in the rear every day. Would've kept it? But I needed something with 4 doors and 4wd.
74b779ea76a09da6dfe6539f3969a2c5.jpg


As for long travel shocks I would run either king or fox. I run fox on my 4Runner and love them.
59dc19492bb1dda44799fa8cec850e1b.jpg

I also don't run a sway bar on my 4Runner because I have never had one on a vehicle I've owned lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
That news to me. But if there not your thing, a standard link and a wrench achieve the same thing.

I'm just suprised no one has come up with something. It's not like lt is new. I was just wondering is someone has tried or thought of it. I came up with that thought just a bit ago when a tundra drove by. I thought I wonder if that sway bar is wider.

I've thought about trying to fabricate extensions.... or doing an anti rock type setup up front (but that would also require custom arms). Either way, it would have to be something a disconnect could be done on.

Disconnects for IFS are generally pretty complex. Even if it is bolted... it's not easy to get out of the way from the CVs when not connected. What I have on my truck now is a custom fabricated single sided disconnect (which results in the behavior of a full disconnect). It took a lot of iterations to get it right, but it works fantastic. Perfect road manners and perfect off-road manners. Just have to spend the time taking it off/on while airing up/down. The only slight pain is getting to flat ground to get it back on. It won't line up on uneven ground.

I'll probably eventually come up with something similar for LT (if I feel it is required), it will just take me some time to get there.

That was the entire point of this post really. I want to try to pick a coil over with as much adjustment and platform for road use as possible. I'm not really concerned about the offroad behavior because my main point of LT is more travel... not soaking up bumps at speed although I want that too if I can get it.

I'm starting to think ORIs might be the ticket. Need to do more research, but quick overview makes me think they could be the magic bullet for my particular use case.
 
Last edited:
Suspension travel you say?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8D94uZPKQcA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,087
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top