Thinking of going from 35's to 37's

Havik

New member
I took advantage of the Black Friday sale AFC was having and purchased their fenders. The fenders have a 3" flare and 2" rise. I think we these fenders, I should now be able to clear 37" tires (I currently have 35s and they fit fine). I believe the front will fit, my question is will the rears fit or will I have to make more modifications in back to make it work.

Who has 37s and what did you do in the back to make them fit, if anything? Please let me know, thanks.
 
Register to hide this ad
To fit 37’s, the fabrication is extensive. The fender is not where the issues are. Check out this post from @amg_t4r on Instagram.

xZIkdz7.jpg


Login • Instagram
 
I took advantage of the Black Friday sale AFC was having and purchased their fenders. The fenders have a 3" flare and 2" rise. I think we these fenders, I should now be able to clear 37" tires (I currently have 35s and they fit fine). I believe the front will fit, my question is will the rears fit or will I have to make more modifications in back to make it work.

Who has 37s and what did you do in the back to make them fit, if anything? Please let me know, thanks.

Id be more concerned about reliability of steering and drivetrain components than clearance when you go that big. When increasing the rolling mass that dramatically OEM components are destined to fail. It's probably fine for pavement and forest service road folks but not so much for people who drive offroad with any significance.
 
https://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/291845-jd-fabrication-lower-arm-pivots.html#post3577797

If I was looking at 37s I would do this instead of chopping the body apart. Moves the front LCA forward up to 1". The front seems to have much more room for clearance.

This is the solution. The marlin crawler long travel setup works great. The original Marlon crawler truck before the Marlin crawler long travel in-house design used an all-pro long travel that was relocated forward about 2 inches. That worked really well also. And that clears 40s. front range off road also has a 3rd gen 4Runner with a very similar setup.

At some point the axles are going to find the limit with the weight of the 4Runner and bigger tires. The steering rack is another concern id have. I'm not sure if you'll break it or not, but what I found is when I'm bound up in the rocks even on 34-in tires I sometimes can't turn. It simply doesn't have enough force and short of trying to really crank the steering wheel and break something, It just doesn't have enough force in the rack to move. I think that's why the Marlin system uses a heavy duty tundra size steering rack.
 
I'm not worried about parts breaking, that is part and parcel of the hobby. I am worried about clearance. If I can't clear them, then I can't put them on, so no need to worry about things breaking. If you are worried about parts breaking, don't modify your 4Runner and stay on paved roads.

If I listened to all the nay-sayers, I wouldn't have 35's, a supercharger, 4.88 gears, and I would never do the trails that I have done.

As far as going big or going home... I agree!!! Believe me, if I could fit 40's I'd get them, forget 39's!
 
Last edited:
I'm not worried about parts breaking, that is part and parcel of the hobby. I am worried about clearance. If I can't clear them, then I can't put them on, so no need to worry about things breaking. If you are worried about parts breaking, don't modify your 4Runner and stay on paved roads.

If I listened to all the nay-sayers, I wouldn't have 35's, a supercharger, 4.88 gears, and I would never do the trails that I have done.

As far as going big or going home... I agree!!! Believe me, if I could fit 40's I'd get them, forget 39's!

I think they mean to say that there should be some concerns on reliability. Like if you are going to always break your steering rack due to the 37s and rocks, then that isn't fun lol
 
I think they mean to say that there should be some concerns on reliability. Like if you are going to always break your steering rack due to the 37s and rocks, then that isn't fun lol

If you break something, you get something stronger to replace it. If you replace it with the same part and expect it to last, you are a fool.

So again, my question is more towards fitting the tires, not reliability of other parts. Thanks.
 
I'm not worried about parts breaking, that is part and parcel of the hobby. I am worried about clearance. If I can't clear them, then I can't put them on, so no need to worry about things breaking. If you are worried about parts breaking, don't modify your 4Runner and stay on paved roads.

If I listened to all the nay-sayers, I wouldn't have 35's, a supercharger, 4.88 gears, and I would never do the trails that I have done.

As far as going big or going home... I agree!!! Believe me, if I could fit 40's I'd get them, forget 39's!

It's mostly about helping you only do the work once. Many of us have been down this road to the end. Maybe you've done the same on other vehicles before too? There's a good reason that there's some pretty standard formulas for various tire size and vehicle weights.

I'm all for experimenting until it fails. That's how we learn what works. Since it's your $$ I vote for portal boxes.

In all seriousness though, it really might be worth considering a bracket lift set at 3" instead of 6". You'd have a lot better geometry than maxing out the control arm angles and it might help the lifespan of the front CVs. It's a tried and true setup for 35s and should be pretty easy to clear 37s too and also have some down travel left.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top