Now that you've actually taken the time to explain the context behind your earlier statements, yes, we are in partial agreement.
But when you say stuff like:
Torque is a "meaningless" metric for consumers.
or
A 185hp diesel engine would be too "small" for a 4runner.
or
The v6 gasoline Colorado can "out-tow" the duramax Colorado.
Don't be surprised or offended when other people disagree with you. Your statements were highly subjective and lacking in context.
And FWIW, I would take the 2.8l turbodiesel inline 4 that Toyota offers in its global 4runners and LC Prado's over the 1GR-FE in a heartbeat.
Actually, there is quite a track record for the 2.8l VM Motori, from which the 2.8L Duramax is derived. It's used in the overseas Jeep, among other SUV's and cars. The US-compliant variant has had some growing pains, as do all new platforms and engines (even Toyota's). But overall, it seems to be an efficient and reliable powertrain.
3,700 RPM is still high and loud for the 1GR-FE (any sustained driving over 2k RPM's is not fun nor efficient).
Also, if you did slow down that much, you'd still be getting crappy mpg's while getting no tangible "performance" benefit over the diesel....so what would be the point?
It will last a good long while. But at 150k-200k miles, many of those vehicles will have depreciated to $6k-$8k. A well-maintained diesel at that mileage will still fetch a good portion of its original MSRP. There is a reason for that price discrepancy. The 1GR-FE is good engine when used for its intended purpose, but it has its limitations as well.
Last edited:
opcorn:
hwell:
