Toyota, One Touch Remote Start - PLEASE!

desertred

Member
This is a bit of a rant despite knowing that such is not well received on this forum. Why can't Toyota provide a simple process to activate the remote start instead of the multi-push button method they devised? There must be a reason that they did not address this feature in the owner's manual. :shrug:

A few mornings ago, the outside temp was -9 degrees fro my morning commute - perfect weather to use the remote start and prep the vehicle (and my nice fanny warmers) for the ride. However, I could not get the remote start to activate no matter how many times I tried. I came back to look up the sequence in the ages old thread on T4R.org to make sure I was using the right procedures. I tried various timing sequences between button pushes. Even the few incantations and dances I did provided no help. I thought that my key fob battery might weak, but I could lock or unlock my vehicle all day from inside the house. Nothing seemed to work, leaving me very PO'd on my way to work and wishing an untimely demise for the engineer or bean counter that is ultimately responsible for the decision to implement this cantankerous procedure. I'm at the point of getting out the stop watch to determine the exact timing required between pushes of the button on the key fob or time required to hold the button down to start the engine. Currently, I only have about a 10% success rate in getting the remote start to operate, making the feature, in my mind, useless!

So, Toyota, why can't you design a one push (or at least a simple method) remote start? Other than this one complaint, I thoroughly enjoy my 4Runner. But, when I want/need a feature, I want to be able to use it!
 
Register to hide this ad
My complaint is the lack of coverage/distance. In a open parking lot, I am lucky to make it work 25yrds away.
Charley
 
Rant away...Toyota took a simple process and made it a joke.

Same reason I purchased an aftermarket unit, $200 bucks cheaper, one button, and works a hundred yards away.
 
Blame the consumer (you, me, everyone) for this, not the engineer. Most changes such as these means a liability suit has or is forseen so lawyers got involved. Unfortunately the sue happy society (not to mention the IQ level of some consumers) we live in force changes in order to have a mass market product. IMO, if engineers had their way half the population would be happy (simple effective design) and the other half would be mad because they would have to read (and comprehend) the directions.
 
Same reason I purchased an aftermarket unit, $200 bucks cheaper, one button, and works a hundred yards away.

This is exactly what the dealer told me when I asked about having the Toyota option. I haven't had too many salespeople tell me NOT to buy something, so I took his advice. As it works out, I would almost never use it, anyway, because Frank stays in the warm garage 90% of the time.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,080
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top