LandCruiser
New member
I would pay up to 45-50k for a plasticky work-centered off road vehicle that is over-engineered and has an SFA. That is what many 2500HD trucks with "base" interiors cost and fill a similar role, but tend to be garbage off road due to their size and length. If you look at what these vehicles cost overseas, that's about right, too, once you account for crippling taxe$.At what price range would you expect the new LC300 be?
Because if it is lower, then will it kill the sales of 4runner? Sequoia? GX?
Would someone buy a plasticky interior “work” vehicle for $70k?
Assuming that it is over-engineered like previous LCs, would the interior or features be adequate to get people to spend $70k? Remember, my LC200 is $85-88k...........and it has a fairly cheap interior (aka fake wood!). If you assume that it is as over-engineered as mine...with a significant lower price tag, then would you buy it? Maybe the enthusiasts initially...but that is far in between.
How many SUVs have a cheaper interior than what i have now for $70k? My interior is nice and decent quality...but certainly not befitting a $85k car!
Ze Germans already have the market cornered on ultra luxury SUVs that would get hi-centered on a soccer field and Toyota AND Lexus make enough successful crossovers, some of which are segment leaders, that they're not hurting by having a dedicated off roader in the stable.
If the new "off road" LC hurts the 4Runner, it's not really a concern for me, since many people on these forums find that it's not enough for their purposes and have modded the suspension, chopped the bumpers and body mounts, complain about lack of an SFA, etc. And it's obvious that none of us are the "target" 4Runner demographic, anyway.