CB radios and mounting.

thanks Doozi
I was wondering why you chose to ground the mount isn't it grounded by the metal you used to reinforce it?
just wondering
 
thanks Doozi
I was wondering why you chose to ground the mount isn't it grounded by the metal you used to reinforce it?
just wondering

Not sufficiently... the bracket is against a painted surface, but I also have a new theory brewing.

I'm wondering if grounding to the body versus the frame would be better for an antenna application. Seeing that the metal surfaces of the body act as part of the antenna and the body is pretty much isolated from the frame, grounding directly to the frame may not be the most appropriate point in this application. Just a theory, but I'm going to give it a try.
 
Last edited:
Not sufficiently... the bracket is against a painted surface, but I also have a new theory brewing.

I'm wondering if grounding to the body versus the frame would be better for an antenna application. Seeing that the metal surfaces of the body act as part of the antenna and the body is pretty much isolated from the frame, grounding directly to the frame may not be the most appropriate point in this application. Just a theory, but I'm going to give it a try.

The body attaches to the frame in many places. Grounding to one of the other "should" be the same. However, RF grounding is more picky then electrical grounding so who knows?

Your SWR can change with your doors open and closed. I wonder how much or if my SWR will change when I take the doors of my jeep this summer?
 
Yes, it is attached in many places, but there also rubber isolators so I'm not sure how "clean" the path would be. It's just a theory that I'm going to test with the hopes that going directly to the body will be more antenna-friendly. I guess if my SWR levels change while retesting in the same spot, I'll know that something was affected and can try tuning from that point.
 
Yes, it is attached in many places, but there also rubber isolators so I'm not sure how "clean" the path would be. It's just a theory that I'm going to test with the hopes that going directly to the body will be more antenna-friendly. I guess if my SWR levels change while retesting in the same spot, I'll know that something was affected and can try tuning from that point.

Post up what you find out.
 
don't know if I went to big
it's more than a foot above the roof line lol
will this be a problem on the trail :thanks:
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0204.jpg
    IMAG0204.jpg
    137.3 KB · Views: 1,060
don't know if I went to big
it's more than a foot above the roof line lol
will this be a problem on the trail :thanks:

Looks like that 4runner is electrically powered from the overhead powerlines- like those old school bumper cars.
 
I hope you got a quick disconnect crashman! Hahaha. Good God that should be GREAT on the highway, assuming you choose the route with no bridges under 20 feet :lookout:
 
Last edited:
He probably has a 1:1 SWR or zero movement on the meter... he's got quite an antenna on there! :). Excellent TX and RX, too.
 
I might have missed something here but who makes and where can I get the hatch mount that zimm and a few others in this thread are using??
 
I decided to make my own CB antenna mount in order to move the antenna further out so it would be out of the way of the rear hatch. I was getting a little tired of having to pull the antenna out of the way every time I opened an closed the hatch. So, borrowing some design cues from the 3rd Gen mount made by a forum member and using the mount I made for the FireStik mount, this is what I did.

4dd4c21e.jpg~original


f96b6698.jpg~original


3cb2074d.jpg~original


2b8518a2.jpg~original


Polished...
eb25fa8f.jpg~original


Then I used a scotch-bright pad to give it a satin finish...
06587316.jpg~original


It'll have a matte clear topcoat when I'm done so it should be well protected.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,080
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top