toybox said:The stickers for the V6 and V8 in CITY driving only reflect a 2 mpg difference. I don't believe you could get 5 mpg better than the V8 under any equal driving conditions IMO.
I never once got the mileage the sticker said
toybox said:The stickers for the V6 and V8 in CITY driving only reflect a 2 mpg difference. I don't believe you could get 5 mpg better than the V8 under any equal driving conditions IMO.
Oh for sure, just thought I'd give an example of an area where V8's are quite popular...obviously our little dealer is no more than a drop in the bucketEDGE said:It's hard to judge the amount of V8 or V6 engines being sold on just what a certain dealer sells, of the 3 dealers I know of 1 can't keep enough V8 loaded LTD in stock and the other 2 have to swap them from other dealers.
I think the V8 sell around 20-40% and the rest is V6, the V8 seems to be more popular then 1 might think.
I don't think me saying 1 or 2 mpg difference is any more of a stretch than you saying you are worried about "extra wear" from full time 4wd lolCVs4Runner said:Who says that I didn't need a new 4Runner? I don't buy used...waste of money IMO. I think that saying there is a1-2 m/g difference is a little bit of a stretch. I would say more of a 5 m/g diff with all the in town driving that I do. I need a truck like the 4Runner for my life. I just know I don't need a V8 to accomplish my tasks. If you do, that is fine. I was just saying that I don't like the gas milage and wear on the car from being full time 4wd. CV
EDGE said:I never once got the mileage the sticker said
chicken-egg, egg-chicken.chunderboy said:Northof49
Just wondering why you think that it would get worse mpg?
EDGE said:Your 4wd system has as much wear as any V8 AWD owner, a fulltime shift on the fly system like the part time V6 4Runners has all parts moving, the only thing you need to do is engage 4HI to get power to the front wheels.
They have changed them over the years but their still the same.
Overall maintenance and cost for the 4x4 system should be the same as the V8 models, the only thing you don't have is an added stress to the front end always being in drive.
If cost was really an issue a V6 camry would be better suited, it lacks all the 4x4 components
GatorGreg said:Woohoo - another V6 v. V8 debate! I need to add one of those popcorn smilies![]()
CVs4Runner said:The part about the full time stuff...exactly. 2wd is less wear. I only use my 4WD for 3 months out of the year except for the time when I just run it to get it moving. But that is why I bought it. So are you saying that those people who live in florida and have only 2wd should have bought a camry b/c to have a 4runner is to have 4wd? Plus, in 2003 (when I bought my 4Runner) the V6 had more horse power than the V8. The V8 had more torque but that was worthless to me. I just feel that for the average american driver, a V6 is sufficient. Until recently the only thing on the market for an SUV was a V6 and those trucks managed fine. In the era of, "get it as big as you can get it," the V8 reigns...but for what reason...because you can get it? If you feel that you need it and want it that is fine. Just don't get down on we people who feel that the V6 is good enough.
CV
chunderboy said:HOT DAMN THIS IS GETTIN' GOOD.
Gator greg,
Share the popcorn dude
CVs4Runner said:
Oh wise one EDGE please explain to me how a truck driven only 3 months a year in 4WD has as much wear and tear on it as a truck that is driven 12 months in 4WD? I owned an all time 4WD before the runner and swore to never do it again. (Insert American freedom clause here.)
CVs4Runner said:
Oh wise one EDGE
jonus4runner said:The all-aluminum 4.0 liter V6 engine that produces 245 horsepower at 5,200 RPM and a healthy 282 lb.-ft. of torque at 3,800 RPM. Now if that is not enough power for all you Tim Allen fans, Toyota is also offering an optional 4.7 liter i-FORCE V8 engine (haw, haw, haw) which raises the torque to 320 lb. ft. Horsepower for the optional V8 on the other hand, is actually lower than the V6 at 235, but that peek horsepower comes in at a lower 4,800 RPM. The net effect of a larger engine producing power at a lower RPM is that real world performance seems more effortless with the engine seemingly loafing while you feel the surge of power pushing you back into the seat. Good enough for a 0 to 60 time of 7.9 seconds. The V6 had plenty of power but, unlike the V8, you can hear the engine working harder to deliver that power.
tkr128 said:Sure, there are times when I wish I had the 8, just so I could say I had the 8. But, the 6 is perfectly fine for me, it has enough power for the way I drive it and getting 24mpg is amazing for an SUV especially when it's $2.85 for a gallon!![]()