The only thing I've given up on is trying to point out the limits of using static footprint to determine psi.
...to match the load capacity of a P-metric tire.*
*A Standard Load tire (SL), usually P-metric (or metric, euro-metric -- a nearly identical twin). This is the tire found on nearly every new car, SUV, and Light Truck. On the sidewall it looks like P265/70/17 (or 265/70/17) as opposed to LT265/70/17.
How much more pressure?
- 10-15lbs, if an LT is switched for a P-metric tire with the same dimensions.
- LT load range (C,D,E) doesn't affect this.
- Tire size does.
This continues to come up and is often a source of confusion.
Not surprising though, considering that both of the following statements are true:
LTs carry less load than P-metric.
LTs carry more load than P-metric.
Throw Load Range into the discussion and things get nice and tangled. Describing the relationships in words doesn't paint a clear picture so I thought I'd try to make some -- pictures, that is.
The charts are based on tire size 265/70/17 and, in the 2nd chart, how it relates to the 5th gen 4Runner because that proved easiest, but the application to other generations is obvious and not too dissimilar. The curves should be reasonably accurate and more than good enough to illustrate the point. P-metric tires get load capacity de-rated 9% when used on an SUV and the curves reflect that. The tables used for reference come from this.
Hopefully it's easy to see how an LT can carry both less and more load than P-metric. It's all about air pressure and, for this tire size, it takes about 12psi added to the LT to match the load capacity of the P-metric tire. Hopefully it's also clear how pretty much the only distinction that matters is between P and LT. Load Range doesn't meaningfully affect the choice of air pressure for LT -- unless very high pressures are desired -- since the the longer load E curve is overlapped by the shorter D and C curves.There may, however, be implications for speed capability in the selection of load range. See Baldwin here.
![]()
Extending the line for LT down past where it ends (because load tables stop there) in this chart might seem to imply that making a pressure adjustment when switching to LT isn't important since it appears there would still be load reserve at 32psi even if no additional pressure was added, but that doesn't mean there's no benefit to adding more pressure (leaving it at 32 would be the equivalent of around 20psi in the stock tire). For one thing, the curve bends more as it goes down the chart towards zero psi, so calculating it as a straight line overestimates load capacity. Secondly, having plenty of load reserve is desirable since tires change over time -- and they don't get stronger. Lower pressures result in more heat which speeds the process. The cumulative effects of dynamic loading, speed, heat, age, hard use -- not to mention the inevitably lower speed rating in an LT -- are all good reasons the load reserve established by the factory tire at recommended pressure should be given due consideration. If nothing else, the level where the tpms triggers should be a good clue to that. Most of this is covered in the doc already linked. There is also the option to http://www.toyota-4runner.org/general-discussions/110300-ask-tire-engineer.html. The horizontal lines on the P-metric tires represent the ability to add pressure for special conditions (like high speed) but the extra psi assigns no additional load capacity. The language in load tables indicates that extra pressure for LTs at high speed is recommended, as well, and at lower speed thresholds than P-metric. The capability of a tire in both load and speed necessarily overlap each other.
![]()
Tire size makes a difference. More air equals more load capacity, whether it's a bigger tire or more pressure in a given tire. The grey curve extends the full distance, so it would be Load E
![]()
I still don't understand why people try to match stock tire maximum load with new LT tires. And nobody explained it to me so far : )
All we need to do is to "Check that the number given by dividing the maximum load by 1.10 of the replacement tire is greater than 1/2 of the Gross Axle Weight Ratings
(GAWR) of either the front axle or the rear axle, whichever is greater." as per manual.
So tire pressure should be set to support 1719.5 lbs of weight (for 2010 SR5) which is abut 35 psi on the graph above.
For those who have C load LT265/70R17 tires I can say that past 6 years I was running them at average 36 psi and it's perfectly fine unless you run your truck loaded over maximum weight rating.
Take a look at the article from Nitto Tire that I attached. Should answer a lot of questions for you.
It's sort of not answering my main question, why to match stock P-metric tire maximum load rating when Toyota manual tells us that new tire has to match (or exceed) vehicle load rating. Same logic as with speed rating, nobody tries to match speed rating for stock tires, logical thing is to match your driving maximum speed : )
So I don't really understand the fact that if axles can support maximum of 6,878 lbs, why would we want to inflate our tires to support 8,300 lbs and reduce tires grip as a result.
But that's exactly what Toyota is recommending with 32psi on their p-metric tires. If you look at the graph, that's 2200 lbs. Think of it this way: Toyota is overcompensating for the p-metric for potential offroad use by a factor of about 30%. CYA engineering. What they state in the owners manual is the absolute minimum; the lowest rated p-metric goes to around 2000 lbs and takes air at around 27 psi. Can't get anything lower in that size (that I'm aware of). And they're probably trying to avoid the situation that Ford ran into with their low-air Firestones (you know, the whole Explorer thing).
Note as well, there are no LT-metrics that satisfy the owners manual minimum; the lowest is around 1900 lbs and has an air pressure of 35 psi. There is nothing lower than that (or at least not that I know of). In other words, these curves don't just continue downward other than theoretically.
So the idea is to put a known volume of air into your LT metric so that you are not under-inflated (leading to the high temps and problems down the road). Failure from this type of issue could well be catastrophic in nature and totally unexpected.
If you think of the tires as your foundation, it doesn't matter if they support more than the minimum weight as long as they're carrying the recommended air pressure. In a house, it doesn't matter if the design calls for 2x8 construction and you use 2x12's as joists instead. On the other hand, if the house calls for 2x12 construction and you use 2x8's --trouble.
I agree that it won't harm if you inflate tires to handle more weight than axles can support. Just don't see it necessary. Keep in mind though that tires won't be in full contact with pavement unless center knobs wear out a little bit.
I don't agree however that stock tire 32 psi is for overcompensating for off-road use. You normally want to lower tires pressure for off-road driving to provide more grip on rocks, mud and sand. 32 psi for P-metrics in my opinion is more about ride quality and maybe compensating for ambient temperature change. Tire inflation sensors are set for way less than 32 psi.
As to the first part, I think we're still pretty far apart. I'm not anything even close to a tire engineer but the tires they put on the vehicle are placarded at 32 psi for a reason. What you're saying is that it should be okay to run them at, say 28 psi, because of the axle loads. What I'm saying is that if I still had the original p-metrics on, I would be airing them to the manufacturers (both vehicle and tire) recommendation to assure the longest life and to avoid overheating at highway speed. I'm assuming there's other design specs at play other than just axle loads.
Saw the pic of your 2010 truck by the way. Nice!