wfo9
New member
The ATRAC is pretty darn good. It gets the job done in most situations, but it still does not compare to mechanical lockers. There are situations where it works better than a mechanical locker (slick off camber climbs where lockers tend to crab the vehicle bad), but there are probably many more situations where the mechanical locker is much better (mainly because of the predictability at slow speeds, and the ATRAC simply does not work at high wheel speeds). ATRAC more or less has a mind of its own, but you learn how to work within its sweet spot. It's nice because it is much less stress on the drive line compared to a locker. When I'm out on difficult trails I tend keep ATRAC on and flip on my rear locker when I get to significant obstacles. The front only gets turned on when I need absolute control of the front wheels crawling up on a steep ledge...
Overall, the toyota e-lockers seem pretty good. They don't always engage immediately... and there is some built in limitation out of the box that only allows ATRAC and the locker to work together below 4mph... (this can be hacked though...).
I have seen quite a few FJs and 4th gens blow up rear diffs with the e-locker engaged, but the 5th gens have a slightly stronger setup (called an 8.2 vs an 8.0). I have not witnessed an 8.2 letting go yet. Same with the 5th gen front CV axles, they seem stronger, but time will tell for sure.
Overall, the toyota e-lockers seem pretty good. They don't always engage immediately... and there is some built in limitation out of the box that only allows ATRAC and the locker to work together below 4mph... (this can be hacked though...).
I have seen quite a few FJs and 4th gens blow up rear diffs with the e-locker engaged, but the 5th gens have a slightly stronger setup (called an 8.2 vs an 8.0). I have not witnessed an 8.2 letting go yet. Same with the 5th gen front CV axles, they seem stronger, but time will tell for sure.