I didn't make up anything. In fact I stated it in the form of a question, but I do believe it to be accurate from an article I've read in the last few days. Was ndecents stat made up? You also missed the ONE I was actually referring to. Not sure if that's ignorance or intentional oversight.
20%...
Let me guess...this article: Americans ? not foreigners ? have committed 80 percent of terrorist attacks in the US since 9/11 - Vox
LOL...learn about statistics and sampling bias before talking dude. That's all i am going to say. Bogus article from a bogus source.
Thanks for that "revealing" statistics. I did not care for it, but since you challenged me...i had to look it up. Show that "article" to a statistic professor and he will laugh his a$$ off!!!
I know you better now and you're right about your previous quote. :hatsoff:
Remember Saddam?
Many Americans are now asking themselves was Saddam that bad? What about moammar gadhafi?
Bad guys but ISIS is worse. And what about Saudi Arabia? Are they not just as bad as Saddam or worse?
I believe the stats in the article you linked come from the New American foundation. Not the same article I read, but the source is the same I believe. Do you have any ACTUAL information to discredit their information??
Homegrown Extremism: Deadly Attacks Since 9/11 | The International Security Program
New America Foundation - SourceWatch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_America_(organization)
So the tech industry is in on the big Obama conspiracy?
Schmidt is.![]()
Show NAF study to a statistic professor and he can explain the flaws. Sampling bias galore. Look at the criteria and how it is being manipulated. As they say, statistics can be bent many different ways to show an effect.
But hey, if those stats make a believer out of you, then it worked.
If you made a reasonable counter argument, backed up by your own data, or something besides vague conjecture my opinion might be swayed...
Is this meant to be sarcastic? (genuinely, i'm not sure)
You are kind of making my point for me. Its western intervention that has led to much of the chaos currently happening in that part of the world...
Hilariously, you want me to quit my day job and take care of this for you? Run through years of data and then perform statistical analysis?
Sorry, I just don't care about your opinion. :hatsoff:
what point?
we need to get our noses out of all other countries business. we are not the world police. we need to stop trying to help people that do not want our help. we need to stop giving them our money, and we need to stop taking their "refuges".
so yes, an immediate cease and desist of all foreign aid in any form.
That's how debates work. If you don't have the time then quit posting and wasting the rest of our time.
The point that it is a mess we created. I agree about staying out of other countries business, but you can invade countries, take out their leaders, create chaos and then say "wow your country is ****ed, see ya later"
LOL...you posting bias statistics from some bogus source is debating in YOUR book???????
JD, stop it dude. No need to get angry with what i wrote. Calm down. Relax. Don't believe me? Ask another person to look at NAF's statistics or read VOX explanation of it. That's all.
And it's true...why would i care about your opinion...you should not care about mine. We're all good here. :hatsoff:
As I've said before, threads getting hopelessly de-railed in OT generally comes down to one person. As does the ridiculous hyperbole and unfounded statements.
You mean like you stating that we started this sh!t in Middle East? You mean like you not having a damn clue about Sunnis and Shiites differences?
Again, i agree with you. That one person may be......ready.......YOU. :toilet3:
But coalition bombing plays a huge part. As does the history of Western presence in the middle East.
I'm not anti-gun but how the hell can you buy an assault rifle after being on an FBI watch list.
-JD- said:I'm not angry. I'm trying to explain to you basic debating. If you are going to accuse someone of misrepresenting data or doctoring studies you have to have something to back it up. Vague conspiracy theories about Obama and Eric Schmidt, unsupported by anything other than you, dont count.
As I've said before, threads getting hopelessly de-railed in OT generally comes down to one person. As does the ridiculous hyperbole and unfounded statements.